Anand v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 372
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Case Date | March 26, 2019 |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
| Citations | 2019 FC 372 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Hekmatian v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 515
...fairness is lessened because it would otherwise “unduly encumber efficient administration” (Anand v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 372 at paras 34-35, 37; Singh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 115 at para 25). The Applicant’s case did not give rise to any proc......
-
Akhtar v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2022 FC 595
...that the onus is on an applicant in a TRV application to provide sufficient evidence: Anand v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 372 at para 37. Put another way, the Officer is under no obligation to ask for further information if an applicant has not met their burden; the applic......
-
Sangha v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 62
...generally applied to the review of an immigration officer’s refusal of a TRV: Anand v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 372 (CanLII) at para 9; Paramasivam v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 811 (CanLII) at para 14). [10] The applicable stan......
-
Gomes v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 451
...ties in Canada” act as a neutral factor at best. As Justice McVeigh has recently affirmed in Anand v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 372 at para 30, it is not an error for an officer to consider strong family connections to Canada as a reason that an Applicant might remain in ......
3 cases
-
Akhtar v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2022 FC 595
...that the onus is on an applicant in a TRV application to provide sufficient evidence: Anand v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 372 at para 37. Put another way, the Officer is under no obligation to ask for further information if an applicant has not met their burden; the applic......
-
Sangha v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 62
...generally applied to the review of an immigration officer’s refusal of a TRV: Anand v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 372 (CanLII) at para 9; Paramasivam v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 811 (CanLII) at para 14). [10] The applicable stan......
-
Gomes v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 451
...ties in Canada” act as a neutral factor at best. As Justice McVeigh has recently affirmed in Anand v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 372 at para 30, it is not an error for an officer to consider strong family connections to Canada as a reason that an Applicant might remain in ......