Andersen et al. v. St. Jude Medical Inc. et al., [2003] O.T.C. 826 (SC)

JudgeCullity, J.
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Case DateSeptember 16, 2003
JurisdictionOntario
Citations[2003] O.T.C. 826 (SC)

Andersen v. St. Jude Medical Inc., [2003] O.T.C. 826 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2003] O.T.C. TBEd. SE.067

Erik Andersen, Yvonne Andersen and Sharon Frost (plaintiffs/moving parties) v. St. Jude Medical Inc. and St. Jude Medical Canada Inc. (defendants/respondents)

(File No. 00-CV-195906CP)

Indexed As: Andersen et al. v. St. Jude Medical Inc. et al.

Court of Ontario

Superior Court of Justice

Cullity, J.

September 16, 2003.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Practice - Topic 209.3

Persons who can sue and be sued - Individuals and corporations - Status or standing - Class actions - Certification - Considerations (incl. when class action appropriate) - See paragraphs 1 to 83.

Cases Noticed:

Rumley et al. v. British Columbia, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 184; 275 N.R. 342; 157 B.C.A.C. 1; 256 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 25].

Pearson v. Inco Ltd. et al., [2002] O.T.C. 515 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 33].

Gariepy et al. v. Shell Oil Co. et al., [2002] O.T.C. 459; 23 C.P.C.(5th) 360 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 33].

Wilson v. Servier Canada Inc. et al., [2000] O.T.C. 884; 50 O.R.(3d) 219 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 33].

Nantais et al. v. Telectronics Proprietary (Canada) Ltd. (1995), 25 O.R.(3d) 331 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 33].

Anderson et al. v. Wilson et al. (1999), 122 O.A.C. 69; 44 O.R.(3d) 674 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 33].

Hoy v. Medtronic Inc. et al., [2001] B.C.T.C. 1343; 12 C.P.C.(5th) 370 (S.C.), affd. (2003), 183 B.C.A.C. 165; 301 W.A.C. 165 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 33].

Athey v. Leonati et al., [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458; 203 N.R. 36; 81 B.C.A.C. 243; 132 W.A.C. 243; 140 D.L.R.(4th) 235; 31 C.C.L.T.(2d) 113; [1997] 1 W.W.R. 97, refd to. [para. 35].

Western Canadian Shopping Centres Inc. et al. v. Dutton et al. (2001), 272 N.R. 135; 286 A.R. 201; 253 W.A.C. 201; 201 D.L.R.(4th) 385, refd to. [para. 39].

Hollick v. Metropolitan Toronto (Municipality) et al., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 158; 277 N.R. 51; 153 O.A.C. 279, refd to. [para. 48].

Mouhteros v. DeVry Canada Inc. (1998), 70 O.T.C. 138; 41 O.R.(3d) 63 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 51].

Carom et al. v. Bre-X Minerals Ltd. et al. (1999), 98 O.T.C. 1; 44 O.R.(3d) 173 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 73].

Counsel:

James M. Newland, Gavin MacKenzie, Russell M. Raikes and John Makins, for the plaintiffs/moving parties;

S. Gordon McKee, Jill M. Lawrie, J.A. Prestage and Camille Lemieux, for the defendants/respondents.

This action was heard on June 16, 17, 19 and 20, 2003, before Cullity, J., of the Ontario Superior Court, who released the following decision on September 16, 2003.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT