Anderson v. Anderson, 2010 BCSC 911
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Dardi, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | GIFTS,FRAUD AND MISREPRESENTATION,TRUSTS |
| Citation | 2010 BCSC 911,[2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 911 (SC),[2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 911 |
| Date | 28 June 2010 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
24 practice notes
-
Rawlins v. Rawlins,
...2017 SCC 35 at para. 26-32. [97] Counsel for the defendant also relied on Anderson v. Anderson, 2010 BCSC 911, in which Justice Dardi explained that in some cases the most controversial question will be whether the statement in issue was made in the ......
-
V.J.F. v. S.K.W., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 593
...is unavailable or unpersuasive. The presumption is rebuttable: Pecore at paras. 23-24; Z hu v. Li , 2009 BCCA 128; Anderson v. Anderson , 2010 BCSC 911 at para. 152; Levy v. Levy Estate , [1981] N.S.J. No. 555 at para. 28. [61] Ms. W. relies on this Court's decision in Wells v. Campbell , 2......
-
2023 BCSC 466,
...and summarized in R. v. Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35 at para. 26–32. 97 Counsel for the defendant also relied on Anderson v. Anderson, 2010 BCSC 911, in which Justice Dardi explained that in some cases the most controversial question will be whether the statement in issue was made in the fi......
-
Rawlins v Rawlins,
...and summarized in R. v. Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35 at para. 26–32. 97 Counsel for the defendant also relied on Anderson v. Anderson, 2010 BCSC 911, in which Justice Dardi explained that in some cases the most controversial question will be whether the statement in issue was made in the fi......
Request a trial to view additional results
23 cases
-
Rawlins v. Rawlins, 2023 BCSC 466
...2017 SCC 35 at para. 26-32. [97] Counsel for the defendant also relied on Anderson v. Anderson, 2010 BCSC 911, in which Justice Dardi explained that in some cases the most controversial question will be whether the statement in issue was made in the ......
-
V.J.F. v. S.K.W., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 593
...is unavailable or unpersuasive. The presumption is rebuttable: Pecore at paras. 23-24; Z hu v. Li , 2009 BCCA 128; Anderson v. Anderson , 2010 BCSC 911 at para. 152; Levy v. Levy Estate , [1981] N.S.J. No. 555 at para. 28. [61] Ms. W. relies on this Court's decision in Wells v. Campbell , 2......
-
2023 BCSC 466,
...and summarized in R. v. Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35 at para. 26–32. 97 Counsel for the defendant also relied on Anderson v. Anderson, 2010 BCSC 911, in which Justice Dardi explained that in some cases the most controversial question will be whether the statement in issue was made in the fi......
-
Nelson v. Mallais, 2019 BCSC 130
...paras. 56-70; Doucette v. McInnes, 2009 BCCA 393 at paras. 56-64; Fuller at paras. 48-50, 66-67; Chung at para. 49; Anderson v. Anderson, 2010 BCSC 911 at para. 161 [Anderson]). The grant of a power of attorney at the same time as a grant of joint ownership may indicate that the transferor ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Surprise! A Blog On Secret Trusts
...when the donee's obligations are not referenced in the document under which the property is given to the donee (Anderson v Anderson, 2010 BCSC 911, at para 166). The principles of a secret trust are well established and were confirmed in the B.C. Court of Appeal in Champoise v Prost, 2000 B......