Anderson et al. v. Bell Mobility Inc., [2011] Northwest Terr. Cases Uned. 28
| Judge | Veale, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of Northwest Territories (Canada) |
| Case Date | June 01, 2011 |
| Jurisdiction | Northwest Territories |
| Citations | [2011] Northwest Terr. Cases Uned. 28;[2011] Northwest Terr. Cases Uned. 28 (SC);2011 NWTSC 28 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Anderson et al. v. Bell Mobility Inc., 2014 NWTSC 20
...rejected their argument for this type of calculation in the certification costs decision, cited at Anderson v . Bell Mobility Inc., 2011 NWTSC 28, and my views have not changed. [3] Accordingly, the issue to resolve is whether the Andersons are entitled to basic or enhanced costs under the......
-
Hynes v. Qulliq Energy Corp., [2014] Nunavut Cases Uned. 5 (CJ)
...and Woodley v Yellowknife Education District No.1, 2000 NWTSC 7, [2000] NWTJ No. 8. In the recent case of Anderson v Bell Mobility Inc., 2011 NWTSC 28, [2011] NWTJ No 36 [Anderson], Veale J. described this type of cost award as "enhanced costs". [35] While this litigation was not ......
2 cases
-
Anderson et al. v. Bell Mobility Inc., 2014 NWTSC 20
...rejected their argument for this type of calculation in the certification costs decision, cited at Anderson v . Bell Mobility Inc., 2011 NWTSC 28, and my views have not changed. [3] Accordingly, the issue to resolve is whether the Andersons are entitled to basic or enhanced costs under the......
-
Hynes v. Qulliq Energy Corp., [2014] Nunavut Cases Uned. 5 (CJ)
...and Woodley v Yellowknife Education District No.1, 2000 NWTSC 7, [2000] NWTJ No. 8. In the recent case of Anderson v Bell Mobility Inc., 2011 NWTSC 28, [2011] NWTJ No 36 [Anderson], Veale J. described this type of cost award as "enhanced costs". [35] While this litigation was not ......