Anderson v Braun, 2017 SKCA 93

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeRichards C.J.S., Jackson and Ottenbreit JJ.A.
Citation2017 SKCA 93
Docket NumberCACV2691
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Date26 October 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Wesley Casbohm v. Winacott Spring Western Star Trucks, and GEO Holdings Ltd., 2019 SKQB 44
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 14 Febrero 2019
    ...show, on a balance of probabilities, that “but for” the defendant’s negligent act, the injury would not have occurred: Anderson v Braun, 2017 SKCA 93; Clement v Clement, 2012 SCC 32, [2012] 2 SCR As it relates to occupier’s liability, Mr. Casbohm was a contractual entrant [36] In the circum......
  • Fiesta Barbeques Limited v Andros Enterprises Ltd., 2019 SKCA 114
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 5 Noviembre 2019
    ...enterprise, but that they share a concurrent liability based on their respective roles as parents and teacher. See also: Anderson v Braun, 2017 SKCA 93, [2018] 1 WWR [44]           The Chambers judge’s decision also reflects a second ......
  • A Rhetorical Question for Canadian Appellate Counsel
    • Canada
    • Slaw Canada’s Online Legal Magazine
    • 5 Noviembre 2017
    ...this equally recent decision of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal shows that some judges of that court get the point. Anderson v Braun, 2017 SKCA 93 [38] On the basis of paragraph 12 of Clements, the traditional “but for” test presumptively applies to the case of multiple actors creating a l......
2 cases
  • Wesley Casbohm v. Winacott Spring Western Star Trucks, and GEO Holdings Ltd., 2019 SKQB 44
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 14 Febrero 2019
    ...show, on a balance of probabilities, that “but for” the defendant’s negligent act, the injury would not have occurred: Anderson v Braun, 2017 SKCA 93; Clement v Clement, 2012 SCC 32, [2012] 2 SCR As it relates to occupier’s liability, Mr. Casbohm was a contractual entrant [36] In the circum......
  • Fiesta Barbeques Limited v Andros Enterprises Ltd., 2019 SKCA 114
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 5 Noviembre 2019
    ...enterprise, but that they share a concurrent liability based on their respective roles as parents and teacher. See also: Anderson v Braun, 2017 SKCA 93, [2018] 1 WWR [44]           The Chambers judge’s decision also reflects a second ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT