Anderson v. Double M Construction Ltd.,

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeDouglas
Docket NumberS28640
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date29 July 2021
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Alberta Health Services v Johnston,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 12, 2023
    ...The BC Courts have similarly not recognized the existence of a tort of harassment: Anderson v Double M Construction Ltd, 2021 BCSC 1473 at para 196; Skutnik v British Columbia (Attorney General), 2021 BCSC 2408 at para 32; Ilic v British Columbia (Justice), 2023 BCSC 167 at para [80] &......
  • Alberta Health Services v Johnston,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 12, 2023
    ...case.” The BC Courts have similarly not recognized the existence of a tort of harassment: Anderson v Double M Construction Ltd, 2021 BCSC 1473 at para 196; Skutnik v British Columbia (Attorney General), 2021 BCSC 2408 at para 32; Ilic v British Columbia (Justice), 2023 BCSC 167 at pa......
  • 2023 ABKB 209,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...case.” The BC Courts have similarly not recognized the existence of a tort of harassment: Anderson v Double M Construction Ltd, 2021 BCSC 1473 at para 196; Skutnik v British Columbia (Attorney General), 2021 BCSC 2408 at para 32; Ilic v British Columbia (Justice), 2023 BCSC 167 at pa......
  • 2023 BCSC 167,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...and/or intentional infliction of mental suffering 196 There is no recognized tort of harassment: Anderson v. Double M Construction Ltd., 2021 BCSC 1473 at para. 61; Merrifield v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 ONCA 205 at para. 43. As such, there cannot be a duty of care to protect against......
4 cases
  • Alberta Health Services v Johnston,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 12, 2023
    ...The BC Courts have similarly not recognized the existence of a tort of harassment: Anderson v Double M Construction Ltd, 2021 BCSC 1473 at para 196; Skutnik v British Columbia (Attorney General), 2021 BCSC 2408 at para 32; Ilic v British Columbia (Justice), 2023 BCSC 167 at para [80] &......
  • Alberta Health Services v Johnston,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 12, 2023
    ...case.” The BC Courts have similarly not recognized the existence of a tort of harassment: Anderson v Double M Construction Ltd, 2021 BCSC 1473 at para 196; Skutnik v British Columbia (Attorney General), 2021 BCSC 2408 at para 32; Ilic v British Columbia (Justice), 2023 BCSC 167 at pa......
  • 2023 ABKB 209,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...case.” The BC Courts have similarly not recognized the existence of a tort of harassment: Anderson v Double M Construction Ltd, 2021 BCSC 1473 at para 196; Skutnik v British Columbia (Attorney General), 2021 BCSC 2408 at para 32; Ilic v British Columbia (Justice), 2023 BCSC 167 at pa......
  • 2023 BCSC 167,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...and/or intentional infliction of mental suffering 196 There is no recognized tort of harassment: Anderson v. Double M Construction Ltd., 2021 BCSC 1473 at para. 61; Merrifield v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 ONCA 205 at para. 43. As such, there cannot be a duty of care to protect against......
1 firm's commentaries
  • An Emerging Tort of Harassment in Canada?
    • Canada
    • LexBlog Canada
    • August 22, 2023
    ...courts have also resisted recognizing the tort of harassment (Stein v Waddell, 2020 BCSC 253, Anderson v Double M Construction Ltd, 2021 BCSC 1473). The recognition of a general tort of harassment by the Alberta Court of King’s Bench, coupled with case law post-dating Merrifield[1], may lea......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT