Anderson v Laboucan, 2017 ABQB 642

JudgeHonourable Madam Justice D.C. Read
Citation2017 ABQB 642
Docket NumberFL04 02288
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Date25 October 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • Michel v. Graydon, 2020 SCC 24
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 18 de setembro de 2020
    ...v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609; Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser, 2011 SCC 20, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 3; Anderson v. Laboucan, 2017 ABQB 642; Baldwin v. Funston (2007), 85 O.R. (3d) 721; Foster v. Foster, 2013 BCCA 205; Tepleski v. Girardin, 2017 MBCA 37; Kerr v. Baranow, 2011 SCC ......
  • Child Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • 3 de agosto de 2020
    ...189; MW v KT, 2019 NLSC 14; Sugg v MacNeil, 2016 NSSC 54, citing Smith v Helppi, 2011 NSCA 65 at para 22. Compare Anderson v Laboucan, 2017 ABQB 642. Chapter 9: Child Support on or After paragraph 6 above, is important because once arrears have been remitted by court order, they cannot be s......
  • TAM v MOG,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 1 de setembro de 2021
    ...ABQB 603 at para 41; Darby v Darby, 2015 ABQB 582 at para 103; Annett v Annett, 2017 ABQB 216 at paras 6 and 26; Anderson v Laboucan, 2017 ABQB 642 at para 63. However, a contrary view holds that the Director lacks the jurisdiction to make such an order: see for instance Redekopp v Lindsey,......
  • Boudreau v Boudreau, 2020 NSSC 169
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 5 de junho de 2020
    ...modifications, for both retroactive awards of child support and a retroactive reduction in child support (see, Anderson v Laboucan, 2017 ABQB 642 (“Anderson”) and SCF v SSS, 2019 ABQB 648).  No distinction is made between these two different types of retroactive relief an......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • Michel v. Graydon, 2020 SCC 24
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 18 de setembro de 2020
    ...v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609; Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser, 2011 SCC 20, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 3; Anderson v. Laboucan, 2017 ABQB 642; Baldwin v. Funston (2007), 85 O.R. (3d) 721; Foster v. Foster, 2013 BCCA 205; Tepleski v. Girardin, 2017 MBCA 37; Kerr v. Baranow, 2011 SCC ......
  • TAM v MOG,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 1 de setembro de 2021
    ...ABQB 603 at para 41; Darby v Darby, 2015 ABQB 582 at para 103; Annett v Annett, 2017 ABQB 216 at paras 6 and 26; Anderson v Laboucan, 2017 ABQB 642 at para 63. However, a contrary view holds that the Director lacks the jurisdiction to make such an order: see for instance Redekopp v Lindsey,......
  • Boudreau v Boudreau, 2020 NSSC 169
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 5 de junho de 2020
    ...modifications, for both retroactive awards of child support and a retroactive reduction in child support (see, Anderson v Laboucan, 2017 ABQB 642 (“Anderson”) and SCF v SSS, 2019 ABQB 648).  No distinction is made between these two different types of retroactive relief an......
  • SMF v BWF, 2019 ABQB 806
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 18 de outubro de 2019
    ...2019 ABQB 648 at paras 20 and 21 [36] 2017 ABQB 773 at para 31 affd 2019 ABCA 1 [37] 2014 ABQB 278 (Manderscheid J.) at para 162 [38] 2017 ABQB 642 at paras [39] DBS at para 98 [40] At para 39 [41] McCarty at paras 181-191 [42] 2006 ABQB 712 at para 21 [43] 2008 ABCA 196 at paras 13 and 16 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Child Support on or after Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • 3 de agosto de 2020
    ...189; MW v KT, 2019 NLSC 14; Sugg v MacNeil, 2016 NSSC 54, citing Smith v Helppi, 2011 NSCA 65 at para 22. Compare Anderson v Laboucan, 2017 ABQB 642. Chapter 9: Child Support on or After paragraph 6 above, is important because once arrears have been remitted by court order, they cannot be s......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT