Anderson v. Michaels, 2017 BCSC 238
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Punnett |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | February 15, 2017 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | 2017 BCSC 238 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Prokam Enterprises Ltd. v. British Columbia Farm Industry Review Board,
...review may be summarily struck on application under Rule 9-5. See: Zakreski v. British Columbia Public School Employer’s Association, 2017 BCSC 238, at par. 20; affirmed by Zakreski v. British Columbia Public School Employers’ Association, 2018 BCCA [55] Pursuant to Rule 9-5(1)(a) through (......
-
Anderson v. Michaels, 2018 BCCA 237
...Justice Dickson On appeal from: An order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, dated February 15, 2017 (Anderson v. Michaels, 2017 BCSC 238, Victoria Registry Oral Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Appellant: L. J. Alexander L. R. LeBlanc Counsel for the Respondents: K. Hamilto......
-
Webber v. Worthington,
...[25] The necessary conditions for a valid building scheme were described in Anderson v. Michaels, 2017 BCSC 238 at para. (i) There was a common vendor under whom the various owners derived title; (ii) Before the land was sold there was a scheme relating t......
3 cases
-
Prokam Enterprises Ltd. v. British Columbia Farm Industry Review Board,
...review may be summarily struck on application under Rule 9-5. See: Zakreski v. British Columbia Public School Employer’s Association, 2017 BCSC 238, at par. 20; affirmed by Zakreski v. British Columbia Public School Employers’ Association, 2018 BCCA [55] Pursuant to Rule 9-5(1)(a) through (......
-
Anderson v. Michaels, 2018 BCCA 237
...Justice Dickson On appeal from: An order of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, dated February 15, 2017 (Anderson v. Michaels, 2017 BCSC 238, Victoria Registry Oral Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Appellant: L. J. Alexander L. R. LeBlanc Counsel for the Respondents: K. Hamilto......
-
Webber v. Worthington,
...[25] The necessary conditions for a valid building scheme were described in Anderson v. Michaels, 2017 BCSC 238 at para. (i) There was a common vendor under whom the various owners derived title; (ii) Before the land was sold there was a scheme relating t......