Andries v. Andries, (1997) 119 Man.R.(2d) 224 (QB)

• Judge: Menzies, J.
• Court: Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
• Case Date: June 02, 1997
• Jurisdiction: Manitoba
• Citations: (1997), 119 Man.R.(2d) 224 (QB)

Andries v. Andries (1997), 119 Man.R.(2d) 224 (QB)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [1997] Man.R.(2d) TBEd. JN.045

Melodie Ann Andries (petitioner) v. Roderick George Andries (respondent)

(File No. 95.02.37 F.D.)

Indexed As: Andries v. Andries

Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench

Brandon Centre

Menzies, J.

June 2, 1997.

Summary:

The parties agreed that the wife should have custody of their two daughters. The wife applied for child support in accordance with the Child Support Guidelines.

The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench determined the appropriate amount of child support.

Family Law - Topic 4021.5

Divorce - Corollary relief - Maintenance awards - Considerations - Support tables - A wife had custody of the two children of the marriage, aged 16 and 13 - The wife earned around $14,000 per year and the husband earned almost $44,000 - The wife sought child maintenance in accord­ance with the Guidelines and claimed additional maintenance for health related expenses and for the children's many ex­tracurricular activities - The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench calculated that the basic level of support was $587.15 - The court determined that the health expenses were best dealt with under the husband's medical insurance - The court also deter­mined which extracurricular expenses were extraordinary expenses pursuant to the Guidelines and allowed a monthly cost of $42.34 for those expenses.

Family Law - Topic 4094

Divorce - Corollary relief - Incidental matters - Insurance policies or pension plans naming wife or children beneficiaries - [See Family Law - Topic 4021.5 ].

Cases Noticed:

Barr v. Barr (1990), 70 Man.R.(2d) 316 (Q.B. Fam. Div.), refd to. [para. 27].

Statutes Noticed:

Federal Child Support Guidelines, sect. 6 [para. 12]; sect. 7(1)(c) [para. 7]; sect. 7(1)(f) [para 13]; sect. 7(2) [para. 22]; sect. 7(3) [para. 11].

Counsel:

J.D. Cram, for the petitioner;

P. Fraser, for the respondent.

This application was heard before Menzies, J., of the Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, Bran­don Centre, who delivered the following judgment on June 2, 1997.