Angus Partnership Inc v Salvation Army (Governing Council), 2018 ABCA 206
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice J.D. Bruce McDonald,The Honourable Madam Justice Barbara Lea Veldhuis,The Honourable Madam Justice Sheila Greckol |
| Citation | 2018 ABCA 206 |
| Docket Number | 1701-0300-AC |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 01 June 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 practice notes
-
Hannam v Medicine Hat School District No. 76, 2020 ABCA 343
...2018 ABCA 88 10 Angus Partnership Inc v. Salvation Army (Governing Council) dismissal denied unreported denied 2017 ABQB 568 granted 2018 ABCA 206 11 Arc Line Construction Ltd. v. Smith Trucking Services (1976) Ltd. judgment denied 2018 ABQB 448 12 Arc Line Construction Ltd. v. Smith Trucki......
-
Clark Builders and Stantec Consulting Ltd v GO Community Centre, 2019 ABQB 706
...Each party is obligated to put its “best foot forward” in the application: Angus Partnership Inc v Salvation Army (Governing Council), 2018 ABCA 206 at para 44; Arndt v Banerji, 2018 ABCA 176 at para 38; [Stefanyk v Sobeys Capital Incorporated, 2018 ABCA 125] at para 12. That is, a party ca......
-
Coffey v Nine Energy Canada Inc, 2018 ABQB 898
...must be made on a balance of probabilities (paras 15 & 16; see also [Angus Partnership Inc v Salvation Army (Governing Council), 2018 ABCA 206] paras 41 & 42). It specifically rejected the standard of proof that the moving party's position is "unassailable" such that it is so compel......
-
NEP Canada ULC v MEC OP LLC,
...a transaction will not attract “higher levels of good faith”: Angus Partnership Inc v Salvation Army (Governing Council), 2018 ABCA 206 at para 76 [Angus]. The narrower concept of duty of honesty in contractual performance means that parties may not lie or “knowingly mi......
Request a trial to view additional results
20 cases
-
Hannam v Medicine Hat School District No. 76, 2020 ABCA 343
...2018 ABCA 88 10 Angus Partnership Inc v. Salvation Army (Governing Council) dismissal denied unreported denied 2017 ABQB 568 granted 2018 ABCA 206 11 Arc Line Construction Ltd. v. Smith Trucking Services (1976) Ltd. judgment denied 2018 ABQB 448 12 Arc Line Construction Ltd. v. Smith Trucki......
-
Clark Builders and Stantec Consulting Ltd v GO Community Centre, 2019 ABQB 706
...Each party is obligated to put its “best foot forward” in the application: Angus Partnership Inc v Salvation Army (Governing Council), 2018 ABCA 206 at para 44; Arndt v Banerji, 2018 ABCA 176 at para 38; [Stefanyk v Sobeys Capital Incorporated, 2018 ABCA 125] at para 12. That is, a party ca......
-
Coffey v Nine Energy Canada Inc, 2018 ABQB 898
...must be made on a balance of probabilities (paras 15 & 16; see also [Angus Partnership Inc v Salvation Army (Governing Council), 2018 ABCA 206] paras 41 & 42). It specifically rejected the standard of proof that the moving party's position is "unassailable" such that it is so compel......
-
NEP Canada ULC v MEC OP LLC,
...a transaction will not attract “higher levels of good faith”: Angus Partnership Inc v Salvation Army (Governing Council), 2018 ABCA 206 at para 76 [Angus]. The narrower concept of duty of honesty in contractual performance means that parties may not lie or “knowingly mi......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
The Evolution Of The Test For Summary Judgment: Old Habits Die Hard
...was the only recognized civil standard of proof. On June 1, 2018, Angus Partnership Inc. v Salvation Army (Governing Council), 2018 ABCA 206, followed the Stefanyk decision and stated the chamber's judged erred when it required the moving party to present uncontroverted facts which made it ......