Anteer v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 232
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Strickland, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE |
| Citation | 2016 FC 232 |
| Date | 22 February 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Muhemba v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1207
...at para 32; SA v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 FC 494 at para 16; Anteer v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 232 at paras 50-57; Yamani v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2006 FC 1457 at paras [25] I agree that temporality is normally ......
-
Alam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 922
...paragraphs are largely derived from my decision in SA (at paras 13 to 15). [30] In Anteer v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 232 at paragraphs 50 to 57, Justice Cecily Strickland confirmed that there is no temporal component to an analysis under s 34(1)(f) of the IRPA. The ques......
-
Eyong v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1750
...pursuant to the Criminal Code is not a prerequisite to a finding of inadmissibility under paragraph 34(1)(f) of the IRPA (Anteer v Canada, 2016 FC 232 at paras [20] I turn now to Justice Diner’s decision in Numvi, which the Applicant pleads is analogous to the present case. In Numvi,......
-
S.A. v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 FC 494
...a proper analysis in this case. [14] With respect to the Applicant’s first point, in Anteer v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 232 at paragraphs 50 to 57, Justice Cecily Strickland confirmed that there is no temporal component to an analysis under s 34(1)(f) of the IRPA. The qu......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
-
Muhemba v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1207
...at para 32; SA v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 FC 494 at para 16; Anteer v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 232 at paras 50-57; Yamani v Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2006 FC 1457 at paras [25] I agree that temporality is normally ......
-
Alam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 922
...paragraphs are largely derived from my decision in SA (at paras 13 to 15). [30] In Anteer v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 232 at paragraphs 50 to 57, Justice Cecily Strickland confirmed that there is no temporal component to an analysis under s 34(1)(f) of the IRPA. The ques......
-
S.A. v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2017 FC 494
...a proper analysis in this case. [14] With respect to the Applicant’s first point, in Anteer v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 232 at paragraphs 50 to 57, Justice Cecily Strickland confirmed that there is no temporal component to an analysis under s 34(1)(f) of the IRPA. The qu......