Antunes v. Limen Structures Ltd., [2016] O.A.C. Uned. 59 (CA)

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeLauwers, J.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Subject MatterEMPLOYMENT LAW,DAMAGES,PRACTICE
Citation[2016] O.A.C. Uned. 59 (CA),2016 ONCA 61,[2016] O.A.C. Uned. 59
Date20 January 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Stays Pending Appeal And Judicial Review: What You Need To Know
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 27, 2022
    ...money to fund the appeal and continued possession of it in the event that the appeal is successful": see Antunes v. Limen Structures Ltd., 2016 ONCA 61 at para. This general automatic stay rule under Rule 63.01(1) does not apply, however, where leave to appeal is required or where the lower......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 18, 2016-January 22, 2016)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 26, 2016
    ...that led to the decision. Such conduct will have the effect of displacing the presumption of integrity. Antunes v. Limen Structures Ltd., 2016 ONCA 61 [Lauwers J.A. (In Jamie J. VanWiechen, for the moving party Arnold B. Schwisberg, for the responding party Facts: The Respondent, Mr. Antune......
  • FISHER and NEUMAYER v. SOROKA,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 3, 2021
    ...intended to offer some protection to an appellant against payments it may not have to make” (see Antunes v. Limen Structures Ltd., 2016 ONCA 61, at para. 11), in this case there is no doubt of the defendant’s debt to the plaintiffs.  The parties differ only as to how that......
1 cases
  • FISHER and NEUMAYER v. SOROKA,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 3, 2021
    ...intended to offer some protection to an appellant against payments it may not have to make” (see Antunes v. Limen Structures Ltd., 2016 ONCA 61, at para. 11), in this case there is no doubt of the defendant’s debt to the plaintiffs.  The parties differ only as to how that......
2 firm's commentaries
  • Stays Pending Appeal And Judicial Review: What You Need To Know
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 27, 2022
    ...money to fund the appeal and continued possession of it in the event that the appeal is successful": see Antunes v. Limen Structures Ltd., 2016 ONCA 61 at para. This general automatic stay rule under Rule 63.01(1) does not apply, however, where leave to appeal is required or where the lower......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 18, 2016-January 22, 2016)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 26, 2016
    ...that led to the decision. Such conduct will have the effect of displacing the presumption of integrity. Antunes v. Limen Structures Ltd., 2016 ONCA 61 [Lauwers J.A. (In Jamie J. VanWiechen, for the moving party Arnold B. Schwisberg, for the responding party Facts: The Respondent, Mr. Antune......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT