Arbutus Investment Management Ltd. v. Russell,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Branch |
| Citation | 2022 BCSC 72 |
| Date | 17 January 2022 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | S1810076 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
2023 BCSC 1050,
...credibility does not mean that the matter cannot be dealt with by way of summary trial: see Arbutus Investment Management Ltd. v. Russell, 2022 BCSC 72. 99 A party cannot frustrate an application for judgment by summary trial by failing to adduce evidence and then argue the facts cannot be ......
-
Johansson v Johansson,
...credibility does not mean that the matter cannot be dealt with by way of summary trial: see Arbutus Investment Management Ltd. v. Russell, 2022 BCSC 72. 99 A party cannot frustrate an application for judgment by summary trial by failing to adduce evidence and then argue the facts cannot be ......
-
2023 BCSC 408,
...A particularly helpful distillation of these principles was provided by Justice Branch in Arbutus Investment Management Ltd. v. Russell, 2022 BCSC 72 at paras. 40–50. I will not repeat it here, but will highlight the following (a) the purpose of a summary trial is to expedite the ear......
-
Larkin v MacInnes,
...applicable provisions of the Supreme Court Family Rules in the name of cost or expediency: Arbutus Investment Management Ltd. v. Russell, 2022 BCSC 72 at para. 48, aff'd 2023 BCCA 14 The same issue arises with respect to the blood test results that the respondent attached to his affida......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
-
2023 BCSC 1050,
...credibility does not mean that the matter cannot be dealt with by way of summary trial: see Arbutus Investment Management Ltd. v. Russell, 2022 BCSC 72. 99 A party cannot frustrate an application for judgment by summary trial by failing to adduce evidence and then argue the facts cannot be ......
-
Johansson v Johansson,
...credibility does not mean that the matter cannot be dealt with by way of summary trial: see Arbutus Investment Management Ltd. v. Russell, 2022 BCSC 72. 99 A party cannot frustrate an application for judgment by summary trial by failing to adduce evidence and then argue the facts cannot be ......
-
2023 BCSC 408,
...A particularly helpful distillation of these principles was provided by Justice Branch in Arbutus Investment Management Ltd. v. Russell, 2022 BCSC 72 at paras. 40–50. I will not repeat it here, but will highlight the following (a) the purpose of a summary trial is to expedite the ear......
-
Larkin v MacInnes,
...applicable provisions of the Supreme Court Family Rules in the name of cost or expediency: Arbutus Investment Management Ltd. v. Russell, 2022 BCSC 72 at para. 48, aff'd 2023 BCCA 14 The same issue arises with respect to the blood test results that the respondent attached to his affida......
Request a trial to view additional results