Arisekola v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 275
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 08 March 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Atolagbe v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 868
...Applicants rely on Cox v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 1220 [Cox] and Arisekola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 275 [Arisekola] as support for their argument. However, Cox concerned a request to introduce new evidence to the RPD post-hearing. Similarly, Arise......
-
Shroub v. Canada (Citienship and Immigration), 2021 FC 34
...unreasonable where it failed to consider all three factors under s. 29(4) of the Rules; Arisekola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 275; where the RAD’s reasons stem from material factual errors: Semykina v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 249 at paras 27-28; or w......
-
Ramirez Garcia v. Canada (Citizenship and immigration), 2023 FC 829
...argue that the RAD erred by focusing only on whether the evidence was new, relying on Arisekola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 275 [Arisekola] to support their [30] This argument is without merit. Arisekola concerned a request to introduce new evidence to the RAD after the ......
3 cases
-
Atolagbe v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 868
...Applicants rely on Cox v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 1220 [Cox] and Arisekola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 275 [Arisekola] as support for their argument. However, Cox concerned a request to introduce new evidence to the RPD post-hearing. Similarly, Arise......
-
Shroub v. Canada (Citienship and Immigration), 2021 FC 34
...unreasonable where it failed to consider all three factors under s. 29(4) of the Rules; Arisekola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 275; where the RAD’s reasons stem from material factual errors: Semykina v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 249 at paras 27-28; or w......
-
Ramirez Garcia v. Canada (Citizenship and immigration), 2023 FC 829
...argue that the RAD erred by focusing only on whether the evidence was new, relying on Arisekola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 275 [Arisekola] to support their [30] This argument is without merit. Arisekola concerned a request to introduce new evidence to the RAD after the ......