Arisekola v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 275

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Date08 March 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Atolagbe v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 868
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 10, 2022
    ...Applicants rely on Cox v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 1220 [Cox] and Arisekola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 275 [Arisekola] as support for their argument. However, Cox concerned a request to introduce new evidence to the RPD post-hearing. Similarly, Arise......
  • Shroub v. Canada (Citienship and Immigration), 2021 FC 34
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 11, 2021
    ...unreasonable where it failed to consider all three factors under s. 29(4) of the Rules; Arisekola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 275; where the RAD’s reasons stem from material factual errors: Semykina v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 249 at paras 27-28; or w......
  • Ramirez Garcia v. Canada (Citizenship and immigration), 2023 FC 829
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 12, 2023
    ...argue that the RAD erred by focusing only on whether the evidence was new, relying on Arisekola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 275 [Arisekola] to support their [30] This argument is without merit. Arisekola concerned a request to introduce new evidence to the RAD after the ......
3 cases
  • Atolagbe v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 868
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 10, 2022
    ...Applicants rely on Cox v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 1220 [Cox] and Arisekola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 275 [Arisekola] as support for their argument. However, Cox concerned a request to introduce new evidence to the RPD post-hearing. Similarly, Arise......
  • Shroub v. Canada (Citienship and Immigration), 2021 FC 34
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 11, 2021
    ...unreasonable where it failed to consider all three factors under s. 29(4) of the Rules; Arisekola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 275; where the RAD’s reasons stem from material factual errors: Semykina v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 249 at paras 27-28; or w......
  • Ramirez Garcia v. Canada (Citizenship and immigration), 2023 FC 829
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 12, 2023
    ...argue that the RAD erred by focusing only on whether the evidence was new, relying on Arisekola v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 275 [Arisekola] to support their [30] This argument is without merit. Arisekola concerned a request to introduce new evidence to the RAD after the ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT