Ark Innovation Technology Inc. v. Matidor Technologies Inc.,

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
Neutral Citation2021 FC 1336
Citation2021 FC 1336
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Date01 December 2021
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Alberta v. Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency, 2024 FC 292
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 22 de fevereiro de 2024
    ...and “just” to proceed by summary trial [see Ark Innovation Technology Inc v Matidor Technologies Inc, 2021 FC 1336 at para 18, citing Tremblay v Orio Canada Inc, 2013 FC 109 at para 26 and Vachon Bakery Inc v Racioppo, 2021 FC 308 at paras 8, 12]. As Justice McHaffie stated in......
  • Ewonde v. Canada, 2023 FC 531
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 13 de abril de 2023
    ...37 (Wenzel); Tremblay v Orio Canada Inc., 2013 FC 109 at para 24 (Tremblay); Ark Innovation Technology Inc. v Matidor Technologies Inc., 2021 FC 1336 at paras 17-19 (Ark Innovation Technology). Wenzel and Tremblay cited with approval by the FCA in ViiV Healthcare FCA at para 38). [72] The m......
  • Summary Trial And Other Means Of Adjudicating Intellectual Property Disputes Without A Full Trial
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 29 de maio de 2023
    ...counterclaims dismissed, in the context of a motion for summary trial. And in Ark Innovation Technology Inc v Matidor Technologies Inc, 2021 FC 1336, the parties litigated a software dispute by summary trial on consent, with the plaintiff ultimately succeeding in its motion and obtaining de......
1 cases
  • Ewonde v. Canada, 2023 FC 531
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 13 de abril de 2023
    ...37 (Wenzel); Tremblay v Orio Canada Inc., 2013 FC 109 at para 24 (Tremblay); Ark Innovation Technology Inc. v Matidor Technologies Inc., 2021 FC 1336 at paras 17-19 (Ark Innovation Technology). Wenzel and Tremblay cited with approval by the FCA in ViiV Healthcare FCA at para 38). [72] The m......
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT