Arslan v Şekerbank T.A.Ş, 2018 SKCA 77
| Judge | Richards C.J.S., Herauf and Ryan-Froslie JJ.A. |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Case Date | September 24, 2018 |
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Citations | 2018 SKCA 77 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 practice notes
-
Table of cases
...Safety Systems Inc v Forootan, 2021 FC 773 ............................ 269–70 Şekerbank TAS v Arslan, 2017 SKQB 205, af’d on appeal, 2018 SKCA 77 .........................................................................................51, 157 Sekisui House Kabushiki Kaisha v Nagashima (198......
-
Interlocutory Injunctions: General Principles
...2 FC 527 (TD); Hutchens v SCAM.COM , 2011 ONSC 56 at para 187. 100 See Şekerbank TAS v Arslan , 2017 SKQB 205 at para 40, af’d on appeal 2018 SKCA 77. The plaintif could provide an explanation for delay where it was waiting for the conclusion of ancillary litigation in another jurisdiction ......
-
Recycling Worx Solutions Inc v Hunter,
...Wenzel, 2008 ABCA 290 at para 27 [Dreco Energy]; Simonelli at para 115; SEkerbank TAS v Arslan, 2017 SKQB 205 at paras 37-40, aff’d 2018 SKCA 77 at para 48; R v Gibbons, 2011 ONCJ 218 at para 39. In these cases, all the circumstances at the time of the application are considered, and......
-
Digest: Metcalfe v 101102382 Saskatchewan Ltd., 2018 SKCA 84
...Small Claims Courts Act, SO 1970, c 476, s 71 Rules Considered: QB Rule 3-72(1)(a) Cases Considered: Arslan v Sekerbank T.A.S., 2018 SKCA 77 Bakaluk v McGregor, 2003 SKQB 386, 239 Sask R 185, 45 MVR (4th) 96 Cameco Corp. v Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania, 2008 SKCA 54, 310 Sask R......
Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
-
Recycling Worx Solutions Inc v Hunter,
...Wenzel, 2008 ABCA 290 at para 27 [Dreco Energy]; Simonelli at para 115; SEkerbank TAS v Arslan, 2017 SKQB 205 at paras 37-40, aff’d 2018 SKCA 77 at para 48; R v Gibbons, 2011 ONCJ 218 at para 39. In these cases, all the circumstances at the time of the application are considered, and......
-
Yorkton (City) v Mi-Sask Industries Ltd.,
...is subject to review on a correctness standard: Housen v Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 SCR 235; and Arslan v Şekerbank T.A.Ş., 2018 SKCA 77 at para 43, 38 CPC (8th) 311 [Arslan 2018]. [21] The decision as to whether and on what terms a preservation order should be granted, on the other ......
-
Fibabanka A. Ş. v Arslan,
...How Şekerbank came to pursue a preservation order in Saskatchewan was explained by this Court in Arslan v Şekerbank T.A.S., 2018 SKCA 77, 38 CPC (8 th) 311 [Arslan] in this way: [1] The appellant, Hüseyin Arslan, guaranteed loans o......
-
Cimmer v Niessner,
...of correctness: Housen v Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33 at paras 8–9, [2002] 2 SCR 235; Arslan v Şekerbank T.A.Ş, 2018 SKCA 77 at para 43, 38 CPC (8th) 311; and Charles v SGI, 2021 SKCA 11 at para 14, 456 DLR (4th) 132. [74] ......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...Safety Systems Inc v Forootan, 2021 FC 773 ............................ 269–70 Şekerbank TAS v Arslan, 2017 SKQB 205, af’d on appeal, 2018 SKCA 77 .........................................................................................51, 157 Sekisui House Kabushiki Kaisha v Nagashima (198......
-
Interlocutory Injunctions: General Principles
...2 FC 527 (TD); Hutchens v SCAM.COM , 2011 ONSC 56 at para 187. 100 See Şekerbank TAS v Arslan , 2017 SKQB 205 at para 40, af’d on appeal 2018 SKCA 77. The plaintif could provide an explanation for delay where it was waiting for the conclusion of ancillary litigation in another jurisdiction ......
-
Digest: Metcalfe v 101102382 Saskatchewan Ltd., 2018 SKCA 84
...Small Claims Courts Act, SO 1970, c 476, s 71 Rules Considered: QB Rule 3-72(1)(a) Cases Considered: Arslan v Sekerbank T.A.S., 2018 SKCA 77 Bakaluk v McGregor, 2003 SKQB 386, 239 Sask R 185, 45 MVR (4th) 96 Cameco Corp. v Insurance Co. of the State of Pennsylvania, 2008 SKCA 54, 310 Sask R......