Ashraf v Zinner, 2019 ABQB 389
Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice D.A. Labrenz |
Citation | 2019 ABQB 389 |
Date | 24 May 2019 |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
Docket Number | 1401 03230 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Hemraj v Caron & Partners LLP,, 2020 ABQB 246
...the second set of counsel. Similarly, errors by the second set of lawyers do not absolve the first set. As observed in Ashraf v Zinner, 2019 ABQB 389 at paras [137] The law does not absolve Mr. Zinner from liability, even where there are two or more tortfeasors involved, merely because othe......
-
Ivanovic v Howell,
...of the underlying action, as can be best accomplished”: Adenshina at para 4. [143] In Ashraf v Zinner, 2019 ABQB 389 (aff’d 2020 ABCA 207, leave to appeal to SCC refused (2021 CarswellAlta 46), this Court said this at paragraph …I am aware in Alb......
-
Malton v Attia,
...the standard of a reasonably competent and diligent lawyer. An error of judgment is not sufficient: Spence at para 27; Ashraf v Zinner, 2019 ABQB 389 at paras 59-60 (Ashraf), aff’d 2020 ABCA [14] The standard is always assessed given the circ......
-
Raichura v Jones, 2020 ABQB 139
...requirement for expert opinion to be shared in advance and the ability to cross-examine the expert, at para 25. See also Ashraf v Zinner, 2019 ABQB 389, at paras [148] I find that the specialized practice of a family law lawyer assisting a client in mediation is not an area where judicial n......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Hemraj v Caron & Partners LLP,, 2020 ABQB 246
...the second set of counsel. Similarly, errors by the second set of lawyers do not absolve the first set. As observed in Ashraf v Zinner, 2019 ABQB 389 at paras [137] The law does not absolve Mr. Zinner from liability, even where there are two or more tortfeasors involved, merely because othe......
-
Ivanovic v Howell,
...of the underlying action, as can be best accomplished”: Adenshina at para 4. [143] In Ashraf v Zinner, 2019 ABQB 389 (aff’d 2020 ABCA 207, leave to appeal to SCC refused (2021 CarswellAlta 46), this Court said this at paragraph …I am aware in Alb......
-
Malton v Attia,
...the standard of a reasonably competent and diligent lawyer. An error of judgment is not sufficient: Spence at para 27; Ashraf v Zinner, 2019 ABQB 389 at paras 59-60 (Ashraf), aff’d 2020 ABCA [14] The standard is always assessed given the circ......
-
Raichura v Jones, 2020 ABQB 139
...requirement for expert opinion to be shared in advance and the ability to cross-examine the expert, at para 25. See also Ashraf v Zinner, 2019 ABQB 389, at paras [148] I find that the specialized practice of a family law lawyer assisting a client in mediation is not an area where judicial n......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Damages And Liability In Professional Negligence Actions: The Case Of Ashraf v Zinner
...entitled to? Over the course of the past eight years, this question has been grappled with by the Alberta courts in Ashraf v Zinner, 2019 ABQB 389 (upheld on appeal in 2020 ABCA 207 with leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada refused) and in the damages decision rendered orally on M......