Ashraf v Zinner, 2019 ABQB 389

JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice D.A. Labrenz
Citation2019 ABQB 389
Date24 May 2019
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Docket Number1401 03230
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • Hemraj v Caron & Partners LLP,, 2020 ABQB 246
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 9, 2020
    ...the second set of counsel. Similarly, errors by the second set of lawyers do not absolve the first set. As observed in Ashraf v Zinner, 2019 ABQB 389 at paras [137] The law does not absolve Mr. Zinner from liability, even where there are two or more tortfeasors involved, merely because othe......
  • Ivanovic v Howell,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 4, 2021
    ...of the underlying action, as can be best accomplished”: Adenshina at para 4. [143]     In Ashraf v Zinner, 2019 ABQB 389 (aff’d 2020 ABCA 207, leave to appeal to SCC refused (2021 CarswellAlta 46), this Court said this at paragraph …I am aware in Alb......
  • Malton v Attia,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 30, 2021
    ...the standard of a reasonably competent and diligent lawyer. An error of judgment is not sufficient: Spence at para 27; Ashraf v Zinner, 2019 ABQB 389 at paras 59-60 (Ashraf), aff’d 2020 ABCA [14]        The standard is always assessed given the circ......
  • Raichura v Jones, 2020 ABQB 139
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 24, 2020
    ...requirement for expert opinion to be shared in advance and the ability to cross-examine the expert, at para 25. See also Ashraf v Zinner, 2019 ABQB 389, at paras [148] I find that the specialized practice of a family law lawyer assisting a client in mediation is not an area where judicial n......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Hemraj v Caron & Partners LLP,, 2020 ABQB 246
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 9, 2020
    ...the second set of counsel. Similarly, errors by the second set of lawyers do not absolve the first set. As observed in Ashraf v Zinner, 2019 ABQB 389 at paras [137] The law does not absolve Mr. Zinner from liability, even where there are two or more tortfeasors involved, merely because othe......
  • Ivanovic v Howell,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 4, 2021
    ...of the underlying action, as can be best accomplished”: Adenshina at para 4. [143]     In Ashraf v Zinner, 2019 ABQB 389 (aff’d 2020 ABCA 207, leave to appeal to SCC refused (2021 CarswellAlta 46), this Court said this at paragraph …I am aware in Alb......
  • Malton v Attia,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 30, 2021
    ...the standard of a reasonably competent and diligent lawyer. An error of judgment is not sufficient: Spence at para 27; Ashraf v Zinner, 2019 ABQB 389 at paras 59-60 (Ashraf), aff’d 2020 ABCA [14]        The standard is always assessed given the circ......
  • Raichura v Jones, 2020 ABQB 139
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 24, 2020
    ...requirement for expert opinion to be shared in advance and the ability to cross-examine the expert, at para 25. See also Ashraf v Zinner, 2019 ABQB 389, at paras [148] I find that the specialized practice of a family law lawyer assisting a client in mediation is not an area where judicial n......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT