Aspen Planers Ltd. et al. v. Assessor of Area No. 23 - Kamloops et al., [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1573
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Sharma, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | STATUTES,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,REAL PROPERTY TAX |
| Date | 02 September 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority v. British Columbia (Assessor of Area #01-Capital), 2018 BCSC 535
...properties are single improvements or multiple improvements for the purpose of assessment: Aspen Planers Ltd. v. Assessor of Area # 23, 2015 BCSC 1573, with supplementary reasons at 2015 BCSC 2209 ; Canpar Industries Ltd. v. Assessor of Area #17 - Penticton, 2000 BCSC 509 ; Unitel Communi......
-
Shular v Alberta (Appeals Commission of the Workers’ Compensation Board), 2018 ABQB 379
...d'appel en matière de lésions professionnelles), [1993] 2 SCR 756, 154 NR 104; and Aspen Planers Ltd v Assessor of Area, 2015 BCSC 1573 at para 72, 4 Admin LR (6th) [65] In the present proceeding, the Applicant was travelling in the d......
-
HOOPP Realty Inc v Edmonton (City), 2018 ABQB 404
...It is interesting that the British Columbia Supreme Court considered Altus Group in Aspen Planers Ltd Assessor of Area #23, 2015 BCSC 1573 and held at paragraph [72] Based on the foregoing discussion, I conclude that the inconsistency in a tribunal ......
-
ISH Energy Ltd. v. British Columbia (Finance), 2017 BCCA 62
...The producer maintains that inconsistency can be an independent ground for judicial review (Aspen Planers Ltd. v. Assessor Area #23, 2015 BCSC 1573 at para. 69 and 2015 BCSC 2209, relying on Altus Group Limited v. Calgary (City), 2015 ABCA 86 at paras. 27 and 31 in particular), and allowing......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority v. British Columbia (Assessor of Area #01-Capital), 2018 BCSC 535
...properties are single improvements or multiple improvements for the purpose of assessment: Aspen Planers Ltd. v. Assessor of Area # 23, 2015 BCSC 1573, with supplementary reasons at 2015 BCSC 2209 ; Canpar Industries Ltd. v. Assessor of Area #17 - Penticton, 2000 BCSC 509 ; Unitel Communi......
-
Shular v Alberta (Appeals Commission of the Workers’ Compensation Board), 2018 ABQB 379
...d'appel en matière de lésions professionnelles), [1993] 2 SCR 756, 154 NR 104; and Aspen Planers Ltd v Assessor of Area, 2015 BCSC 1573 at para 72, 4 Admin LR (6th) [65] In the present proceeding, the Applicant was travelling in the d......
-
HOOPP Realty Inc v Edmonton (City), 2018 ABQB 404
...It is interesting that the British Columbia Supreme Court considered Altus Group in Aspen Planers Ltd Assessor of Area #23, 2015 BCSC 1573 and held at paragraph [72] Based on the foregoing discussion, I conclude that the inconsistency in a tribunal ......
-
ISH Energy Ltd. v. British Columbia (Finance), 2017 BCCA 62
...The producer maintains that inconsistency can be an independent ground for judicial review (Aspen Planers Ltd. v. Assessor Area #23, 2015 BCSC 1573 at para. 69 and 2015 BCSC 2209, relying on Altus Group Limited v. Calgary (City), 2015 ABCA 86 at paras. 27 and 31 in particular), and allowing......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Property Assessment: Assessors Should Not Change Applicable Tests At Whim
...court may find their decision to be unreasonable. This principle was recently illustrated in Aspen Planers Ltd. v. Assessor of Area #23, 2015 BCSC 1573. The technical question in Aspen was whether certain buildings were separate industrial improvements, or whether they formed part of pre-ex......