Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. et al.

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
JudgeLaskin, C.J.C., Martland, Ritchie, Dickson, Beetz, Estey, McIntyre, Chouinard and Lamer, JJ.
Citation(1981), 29 A.R. 350 (SCC)
Date22 June 1981

Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco (1981), 29 A.R. 350 (SCC)

MLB headnote and full text

Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. Ltd. et al. and Attorney General of Alberta

Indexed As: Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. et al.

Supreme Court of Canada

Laskin, C.J.C., Martland, Ritchie, Dickson, Beetz, Estey, McIntyre, Chouinard and Lamer, JJ.

June 22, 1981.

Summary:

This case arose out of an application by several oil companies to the Alberta Energy Resources Conservation Board for approval of a tar sands development project, known as "The Alsands Project". The Athabasca Tribal Council, consisting of the chiefs of five Indian bands, intervened in the application. The council proposed that the board impose on the developers, as a condition of approval of the project, an affirmative action program giving preference in employment and business opportunities to members of the five bands. The board reported to the Lieutenant Governor in Council that such an affirmative action program would be contrary to the Alberta Individual's Rights Protection Act. The Indian band council appealed to the Alberta Court of Appeal.

The Alberta Court of Appeal held that the board had no jurisdiction to order an affirmative action program directed at pre-existing social problems in the area, but only one directed at the problems which would be created by the development project itself - see 22 A.R. 541. The Court of Appeal held further that such an affirmative action program based on racial criteria would be in breach of the Alberta Individual's Rights Protection Act. The Indian band council appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.

The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the appeal.

Mines and Minerals - Topic 7083

Regulation - Boards - Jurisdiction respecting affirmative action programs - The Supreme Court of Canada held that the Alberta Energy Resources Conservation Board had no jurisdiction under the Energy Resources Conservation Act and the Gas and Oil Conservation Act to order an "affirmative action" program as a condition of the approval of a tar sands plant.

Civil Rights - Topic 990

Discrimination - Employment - Affirmative action programs, validity of - Ritchie, J., of the Supreme Court of Canada, speaking for a minority, stated that a proposed affirmative action program based on racial criteria would not be in breach of the Alberta Individual's Rights Protection Act - See paragraphs 22 to 28.

Cases Noticed:

Regents of University of California v. Bakke (1978), 98 S. Ct. 2733, refd to. [para. 24].

United Steelworkers of America v. Weber (1979), 99 S. Ct. 272, refd to. [para. 24].

Statutes Noticed:

Individual's Rights Protection Act, S.A. 1972, c. 2, sect. 6(1), sect. 7 [para. 23]; sect. 11.1 [para. 2].

Energy Resources Conservation Act, S.A. 1971, c. 30, sect. 2 [para. 9]; sect. 24 [paras. 10, 19].

Oil and Gas Conservation Act, R.S.A. 1970, c. 267, sect. 5 [paras. 11, 19]; sect. 43 [para. 12].

Counsel:

Kenneth E. Staroszik, for the appellant;

D.O. Sabey, Q.C. and Brian O'Ferrall, for the respondents Amoco Canada et al.;

Michael J. Bruni and Keith F. Miller, for the respondent Energy Resources Conservation Board of Alberta;

B.A. Crane, Q.C., for the intervenant Attorney General of Alberta.

This appeal was heard by LASKIN, C.J.C., MARTLAND, RITCHIE, DICKSON, BEETZ, ESTEY, McINTYRE, CHOUINARD and LAMER, JJ., of the Supreme Court of Canada at Ottawa, Ontario on December 4 and 5, 1980.

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada was delivered on June 22, 1981 and the following opinions were filed:

LAMER, J. - see paragraphs 1 to 3;

RITCHIE, J. - see paragraphs 4 to 30.

MARTLAND, BEETZ, ESTEY and CHOUINARD, JJ., concurred with LAMER, J.

LASKIN, C.J.C., DICKSON and McINTYRE, JJ., concurred with RITCHIE, J.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 practice notes
  • R. v. Kapp (J.M.) et al.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 11 Diciembre 2007
    ...14 O.A.C. 335, refd to. [paras. 21, 98]. Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. et al., [1981] 1 S.C.R. 699; 37 N.R. 336; 29 A.R. 350, refd to. [para. Ardoch Algonquin First Nation and Allies et al. v. Ontario et al., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 950; 255 N.R. 1; 134 O.A.C. 201; 2000 SCC......
  • R. v. Kapp (J.M.) et al.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 11 Diciembre 2007
    ...14 O.A.C. 335, refd to. [paras. 21, 98]. Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. et al., [1981] 1 S.C.R. 699; 37 N.R. 336; 29 A.R. 350, refd to. [para. Ardoch Algonquin First Nation and Allies et al. v. Ontario et al., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 950; 255 N.R. 1; 134 O.A.C. 201; 2000 SCC......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Individual Employment Law. Second Edition
    • 16 Junio 2008
    ...329 Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co., [1981] 1 S.C.R. 699, 29 A.R. 350, 124 D.L.R. (3d) 1, [1981] 6 W.W.R. 342 ............ 263 ATI Technologies Inc. v. Henry (2000), 5 C.C.E.L. (3d) 101, [2000] O.J. No. 4596 (S.C.J.) .........................................................
  • Roberts et al. v. Ontario et al.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 16 Agosto 1994
    ...52]. Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. et al. and Alberta (Attorney General), [1981] 1 S.C.R. 699; 37 N.R. 336; 29 A.R. 350, refd to. [para. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), 438 U.S. 265, refd to. [para. 84]. Canadian Odeon Theatres Ltd. v. Human......
  • Get Started for Free
7 cases
  • R. v. Kapp (J.M.) et al.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 11 Diciembre 2007
    ...14 O.A.C. 335, refd to. [paras. 21, 98]. Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. et al., [1981] 1 S.C.R. 699; 37 N.R. 336; 29 A.R. 350, refd to. [para. Ardoch Algonquin First Nation and Allies et al. v. Ontario et al., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 950; 255 N.R. 1; 134 O.A.C. 201; 2000 SCC......
  • R. v. Kapp (J.M.) et al.
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 11 Diciembre 2007
    ...14 O.A.C. 335, refd to. [paras. 21, 98]. Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. et al., [1981] 1 S.C.R. 699; 37 N.R. 336; 29 A.R. 350, refd to. [para. Ardoch Algonquin First Nation and Allies et al. v. Ontario et al., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 950; 255 N.R. 1; 134 O.A.C. 201; 2000 SCC......
  • Roberts et al. v. Ontario et al.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 16 Agosto 1994
    ...52]. Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. et al. and Alberta (Attorney General), [1981] 1 S.C.R. 699; 37 N.R. 336; 29 A.R. 350, refd to. [para. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), 438 U.S. 265, refd to. [para. 84]. Canadian Odeon Theatres Ltd. v. Human......
  • Ardoch Algonquin First Nation and Allies et al. v. Ontario et al.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 5 Junio 1997
    ...55]. Athabaska Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. et al. and Alberta (Attorney General), [1981] 1 S.C.R. 699; 37 N.R. 336; 29 A.R. 350, refd to. [para. Action Travail des Femmes v. Canadian National Railway Co. et al., [1987] 1 S.C.R. 1114; 76 N.R. 161; 40 D.L.R.(4th) 193, refd to......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Individual Employment Law. Second Edition
    • 16 Junio 2008
    ...329 Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co., [1981] 1 S.C.R. 699, 29 A.R. 350, 124 D.L.R. (3d) 1, [1981] 6 W.W.R. 342 ............ 263 ATI Technologies Inc. v. Henry (2000), 5 C.C.E.L. (3d) 101, [2000] O.J. No. 4596 (S.C.J.) .........................................................