Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. et al., (1981) 29 A.R. 350 (SCC)

JudgeLaskin, C.J.C., Martland, Ritchie, Dickson, Beetz, Estey, McIntyre, Chouinard and Lamer, JJ.
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Case DateJune 22, 1981
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations(1981), 29 A.R. 350 (SCC)

Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco (1981), 29 A.R. 350 (SCC)

MLB headnote and full text

Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. Ltd. et al. and Attorney General of Alberta

Indexed As: Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. et al.

Supreme Court of Canada

Laskin, C.J.C., Martland, Ritchie, Dickson, Beetz, Estey, McIntyre, Chouinard and Lamer, JJ.

June 22, 1981.

Summary:

This case arose out of an application by several oil companies to the Alberta Energy Resources Conservation Board for approval of a tar sands development project, known as "The Alsands Project". The Athabasca Tribal Council, consisting of the chiefs of five Indian bands, intervened in the application. The council proposed that the board impose on the developers, as a condition of approval of the project, an affirmative action program giving preference in employment and business opportunities to members of the five bands. The board reported to the Lieutenant Governor in Council that such an affirmative action program would be contrary to the Alberta Individual's Rights Protection Act. The Indian band council appealed to the Alberta Court of Appeal.

The Alberta Court of Appeal held that the board had no jurisdiction to order an affirmative action program directed at pre-existing social problems in the area, but only one directed at the problems which would be created by the development project itself - see 22 A.R. 541. The Court of Appeal held further that such an affirmative action program based on racial criteria would be in breach of the Alberta Individual's Rights Protection Act. The Indian band council appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.

The Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the appeal.

Mines and Minerals - Topic 7083

Regulation - Boards - Jurisdiction respecting affirmative action programs - The Supreme Court of Canada held that the Alberta Energy Resources Conservation Board had no jurisdiction under the Energy Resources Conservation Act and the Gas and Oil Conservation Act to order an "affirmative action" program as a condition of the approval of a tar sands plant.

Civil Rights - Topic 990

Discrimination - Employment - Affirmative action programs, validity of - Ritchie, J., of the Supreme Court of Canada, speaking for a minority, stated that a proposed affirmative action program based on racial criteria would not be in breach of the Alberta Individual's Rights Protection Act - See paragraphs 22 to 28.

Cases Noticed:

Regents of University of California v. Bakke (1978), 98 S. Ct. 2733, refd to. [para. 24].

United Steelworkers of America v. Weber (1979), 99 S. Ct. 272, refd to. [para. 24].

Statutes Noticed:

Individual's Rights Protection Act, S.A. 1972, c. 2, sect. 6(1), sect. 7 [para. 23]; sect. 11.1 [para. 2].

Energy Resources Conservation Act, S.A. 1971, c. 30, sect. 2 [para. 9]; sect. 24 [paras. 10, 19].

Oil and Gas Conservation Act, R.S.A. 1970, c. 267, sect. 5 [paras. 11, 19]; sect. 43 [para. 12].

Counsel:

Kenneth E. Staroszik, for the appellant;

D.O. Sabey, Q.C. and Brian O'Ferrall, for the respondents Amoco Canada et al.;

Michael J. Bruni and Keith F. Miller, for the respondent Energy Resources Conservation Board of Alberta;

B.A. Crane, Q.C., for the intervenant Attorney General of Alberta.

This appeal was heard by LASKIN, C.J.C., MARTLAND, RITCHIE, DICKSON, BEETZ, ESTEY, McINTYRE, CHOUINARD and LAMER, JJ., of the Supreme Court of Canada at Ottawa, Ontario on December 4 and 5, 1980.

The judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada was delivered on June 22, 1981 and the following opinions were filed:

LAMER, J. - see paragraphs 1 to 3;

RITCHIE, J. - see paragraphs 4 to 30.

MARTLAND, BEETZ, ESTEY and CHOUINARD, JJ., concurred with LAMER, J.

LASKIN, C.J.C., DICKSON and McINTYRE, JJ., concurred with RITCHIE, J.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 practice notes
  • R. v. Kapp (J.M.) et al., (2008) 256 B.C.A.C. 75 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 11, 2007
    ...14 O.A.C. 335, refd to. [paras. 21, 98]. Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. et al., [1981] 1 S.C.R. 699; 37 N.R. 336; 29 A.R. 350, refd to. [para. Ardoch Algonquin First Nation and Allies et al. v. Ontario et al., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 950; 255 N.R. 1; 134 O.A.C. 201; 2000 SCC......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Individual Employment Law. Second Edition
    • June 16, 2008
    ...329 Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co., [1981] 1 S.C.R. 699, 29 A.R. 350, 124 D.L.R. (3d) 1, [1981] 6 W.W.R. 342 ............ 263 ATI Technologies Inc. v. Henry (2000), 5 C.C.E.L. (3d) 101, [2000] O.J. No. 4596 (S.C.J.) .........................................................
  • R. v. Kapp (J.M.) et al., (2008) 376 N.R. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 11, 2007
    ...14 O.A.C. 335, refd to. [paras. 21, 98]. Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. et al., [1981] 1 S.C.R. 699; 37 N.R. 336; 29 A.R. 350, refd to. [para. Ardoch Algonquin First Nation and Allies et al. v. Ontario et al., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 950; 255 N.R. 1; 134 O.A.C. 201; 2000 SCC......
  • Roberts et al. v. Ontario et al., (1994) 73 O.A.C. 20 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • August 16, 1994
    ...52]. Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. et al. and Alberta (Attorney General), [1981] 1 S.C.R. 699; 37 N.R. 336; 29 A.R. 350, refd to. [para. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), 438 U.S. 265, refd to. [para. 84]. Canadian Odeon Theatres Ltd. v. Human......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • R. v. Kapp (J.M.) et al., (2008) 256 B.C.A.C. 75 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 11, 2007
    ...14 O.A.C. 335, refd to. [paras. 21, 98]. Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. et al., [1981] 1 S.C.R. 699; 37 N.R. 336; 29 A.R. 350, refd to. [para. Ardoch Algonquin First Nation and Allies et al. v. Ontario et al., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 950; 255 N.R. 1; 134 O.A.C. 201; 2000 SCC......
  • R. v. Kapp (J.M.) et al., (2008) 376 N.R. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 11, 2007
    ...14 O.A.C. 335, refd to. [paras. 21, 98]. Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. et al., [1981] 1 S.C.R. 699; 37 N.R. 336; 29 A.R. 350, refd to. [para. Ardoch Algonquin First Nation and Allies et al. v. Ontario et al., [2000] 1 S.C.R. 950; 255 N.R. 1; 134 O.A.C. 201; 2000 SCC......
  • Roberts et al. v. Ontario et al., (1994) 73 O.A.C. 20 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • August 16, 1994
    ...52]. Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. et al. and Alberta (Attorney General), [1981] 1 S.C.R. 699; 37 N.R. 336; 29 A.R. 350, refd to. [para. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), 438 U.S. 265, refd to. [para. 84]. Canadian Odeon Theatres Ltd. v. Human......
  • Ardoch Algonquin First Nation and Allies et al. v. Ontario et al., (1997) 100 O.A.C. 344 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • June 5, 1997
    ...55]. Athabaska Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co. et al. and Alberta (Attorney General), [1981] 1 S.C.R. 699; 37 N.R. 336; 29 A.R. 350, refd to. [para. Action Travail des Femmes v. Canadian National Railway Co. et al., [1987] 1 S.C.R. 1114; 76 N.R. 161; 40 D.L.R.(4th) 193, refd to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Individual Employment Law. Second Edition
    • June 16, 2008
    ...329 Athabasca Tribal Council v. Amoco Canada Petroleum Co., [1981] 1 S.C.R. 699, 29 A.R. 350, 124 D.L.R. (3d) 1, [1981] 6 W.W.R. 342 ............ 263 ATI Technologies Inc. v. Henry (2000), 5 C.C.E.L. (3d) 101, [2000] O.J. No. 4596 (S.C.J.) .........................................................

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT