Aubrey v. Teck Highland Valley Copper Partnership, 2017 BCCA 144
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Newbury,The Honourable Madam Justice A. MacKenzie,The Honourable Mr. Justice Harris |
| Citation | 2017 BCCA 144 |
| Docket Number | CA43808 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Date | 04 April 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
25 practice notes
-
Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. Teva Canada Limited, 2018 FCA 53
...the evidence (citing R. v. J.M.H., 2011 SCC 45, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 197 at paras. 25-28; Aubrey v. Teck Highland Valley Copper Partnership, 2017 BCCA 144), and second on the proposition that a trial judge’s failure to address relevant evidence may constitute a material error justifying appellat......
-
Oswald v. Start Up SRL,
...to contract, it is not subjective intention that is relevant, but objective intention: Aubrey v. Teck Highland Valley Copper Partnership, 2017 BCCA 144 at para. 35; Rudyak v. Bekturova, 2018 BCCA 414 at para. 23. This principle stems from the seminal case, Smith v. Hughes (1871), L.R. 6 Q.B......
-
Li v. Rao, 2019 BCCA 264
...is palpable and overriding error: Strother v. Darc, 2016 BCCA 297 at paras. 13-15, Aubrey v. Teck Highland Valley Copper Partnership, 2017 BCCA 144 at para. 22. An extricable question of law in contract interpretation, however, such as applying the wrong principle, not considering part of a......
-
Escape 101 Ventures Inc. v. March of Dimes Canada,
...The Court of Appeal noted in Aubrey v. Teck Highland Valley Copper Partnership, 2017 BCCA 144 that it is “well-established that it is an error of law to make a finding of fact for which there is no evidence” (see also the comments of the Supreme Court of Canada ......
Request a trial to view additional results
24 cases
-
Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. Teva Canada Limited, 2018 FCA 53
...the evidence (citing R. v. J.M.H., 2011 SCC 45, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 197 at paras. 25-28; Aubrey v. Teck Highland Valley Copper Partnership, 2017 BCCA 144), and second on the proposition that a trial judge’s failure to address relevant evidence may constitute a material error justifying appellat......
-
Oswald v. Start Up SRL,
...to contract, it is not subjective intention that is relevant, but objective intention: Aubrey v. Teck Highland Valley Copper Partnership, 2017 BCCA 144 at para. 35; Rudyak v. Bekturova, 2018 BCCA 414 at para. 23. This principle stems from the seminal case, Smith v. Hughes (1871), L.R. 6 Q.B......
-
Li v. Rao, 2019 BCCA 264
...is palpable and overriding error: Strother v. Darc, 2016 BCCA 297 at paras. 13-15, Aubrey v. Teck Highland Valley Copper Partnership, 2017 BCCA 144 at para. 22. An extricable question of law in contract interpretation, however, such as applying the wrong principle, not considering part of a......
-
Escape 101 Ventures Inc. v. March of Dimes Canada,
...The Court of Appeal noted in Aubrey v. Teck Highland Valley Copper Partnership, 2017 BCCA 144 that it is “well-established that it is an error of law to make a finding of fact for which there is no evidence” (see also the comments of the Supreme Court of Canada ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
B.C. Court Of Appeal Overturns Award Of 18-Month Severance Package Based On An Oral Promise
...question before the B.C. Court of Appeal in Aubrey v. Teck Highland Valley Copper Partnership, 2017 BCCA 144, was whether the employer had made an oral promise to an employee to pay an 18-month severance package equal to $176,250 at the time of separation, regardless of whether the employee......