Aventis Pharma S.A. et al. v. Novopharm Ltd., 2005 FCA 390

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeDécary, Evans and Sharlow, JJ.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Canada)
Subject MatterINJUNCTIONS
Citation2005 FCA 390,[2005] N.R. Uned. 155 (FCA),[2005] N.R. Uned. 155
Date21 November 2005
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
17 practice notes
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (November 2 ' November 6, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 11, 2020
    ...of Transportation), 2013 SCC 13, Tock v. St. John's Metropolitan Area Board, [1987] 2 SCR 1181, Aventis Pharma S.A. v. Novopharm Ltd., 2005 FCA 390, Sengmueller v. Sengmueller (1994), 111 DLR (4th) 19 (Ont. CA), Shelfer v. City of London Electric Lighting Co., [1895] 1 Ch. 287 (C.A.), White......
  • Tractor Supply Co. of Texas LP et al. v. TSC Stores LP, (2010) 376 F.T.R. 218 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • August 30, 2010
    ...44]. Aventis Pharma S.A. et al. v. Novopharm Ltd., [2005] F.T.R. Uned. A18; 2005 FC 815, affd. [2005] N.R. Uned. 155; 44 C.P.R.(4th) 326; 2005 FCA 390, refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Federal Courts Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-7, sect. 50(1) [para. 17]. Counsel: Cliff Cole and James Buchan, fo......
  • Ledshumanan v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2021 FC 1463
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 23, 2021
    ...Apotex Inc, 2011 FC 505 at para 56, aff’d 2011 FCA 211; Aventis Pharma SA v Novopharm Ltd, 2005 FC 815 at paras 59-61, aff’d 2005 FCA 390; Syntex Inc v Novopharm Ltd (1991), 36 CPR (3d) 129 (FCA) at p 135). Simply claiming that irreparable harm is possible is not enough: ......
  • Pierre v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2020 FC 887
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 8, 2020
    ...Canada Inc. v Apotex Inc., 2011 FC 505 at para 56, aff’d 2011 FCA 211; Aventis Pharma SA v Novopharm Ltd, 2005 FC 815 at para 59-61, aff’d 2005 FCA 390). Simply alleging that irreparable harm is possible is not enough: “It is not sufficient to demonstrate that irreparable harm” is “likely” ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
16 cases
  • Tractor Supply Co. of Texas LP et al. v. TSC Stores LP, (2010) 376 F.T.R. 218 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • August 30, 2010
    ...44]. Aventis Pharma S.A. et al. v. Novopharm Ltd., [2005] F.T.R. Uned. A18; 2005 FC 815, affd. [2005] N.R. Uned. 155; 44 C.P.R.(4th) 326; 2005 FCA 390, refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Federal Courts Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. F-7, sect. 50(1) [para. 17]. Counsel: Cliff Cole and James Buchan, fo......
  • Ledshumanan v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2021 FC 1463
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 23, 2021
    ...Apotex Inc, 2011 FC 505 at para 56, aff’d 2011 FCA 211; Aventis Pharma SA v Novopharm Ltd, 2005 FC 815 at paras 59-61, aff’d 2005 FCA 390; Syntex Inc v Novopharm Ltd (1991), 36 CPR (3d) 129 (FCA) at p 135). Simply claiming that irreparable harm is possible is not enough: ......
  • Pierre v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2020 FC 887
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 8, 2020
    ...Canada Inc. v Apotex Inc., 2011 FC 505 at para 56, aff’d 2011 FCA 211; Aventis Pharma SA v Novopharm Ltd, 2005 FC 815 at para 59-61, aff’d 2005 FCA 390). Simply alleging that irreparable harm is possible is not enough: “It is not sufficient to demonstrate that irreparable harm” is “likely” ......
  • Arysta Lifescience North America, LLC et al v. Agracity Crop & Nutrition Ltd. et al, 2019 FC 530
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 25, 2019
    ...harm will follow if the injunction is not granted (Aventis Pharma SA v Novopharm Ltd, 2005 FC 815, at paras 59-61 [Aventis Pharma] aff’d 2005 FCA 390). [34] In a quia timet application, in which the infringing party is not yet in the marketplace, an applicant may establish irreparable harm ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (November 2 ' November 6, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 11, 2020
    ...of Transportation), 2013 SCC 13, Tock v. St. John's Metropolitan Area Board, [1987] 2 SCR 1181, Aventis Pharma S.A. v. Novopharm Ltd., 2005 FCA 390, Sengmueller v. Sengmueller (1994), 111 DLR (4th) 19 (Ont. CA), Shelfer v. City of London Electric Lighting Co., [1895] 1 Ch. 287 (C.A.), White......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT