British Columbia v. Teal Cedar Products Ltd., [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 543 (SC)
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Subject Matter | ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,STATUTES,EXPROPRIATION,MINES AND MINERALS |
| Citation | [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 543 (SC),[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 543,2012 BCSC 543 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Date | 16 April 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
British Columbia v. Teal Cedar Products Ltd., 2015 BCCA 263
...326 , a majority of this Court allowed two appeals that were heard together. They are appeals by the Province from a judgment, indexed as 2012 BCSC 543, given on an appeal and cross-appeal of an arbitration award to Teal Cedar Products Ltd. for compensation under the Forestry Revitalization......
-
Arbitration Parties Beware: The Supreme Court Of Canada Unpacks The Sattva Test For Appellate Review Of Arbitration Awards In Teal Cedar Products Ltd v British Columbia
...was not entitled to improvements compensation for the unaffected license. Judicial History On appeal, the British Columbia Supreme Court (2012 BCSC 543) upheld the arbitrator's award except in connection with the Statutory Application Issue, which was remitted to the arbitrator and resulted......
-
Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. British Columbia, 2017 SCC 32
...465 , 109 L.C.R. 276 , [2013] B.C.J. No. 1480 (QL), 2013 CarswellBC 2059 (WL Can.), setting aside a decision of Bauman C.J., 2012 BCSC 543, [2012] B.C.J. No. 735 (QL), 2012 CarswellBC 1054 (WL Can.), which partially upheld an arbitrator’s decision. Appeal allowed ......
2 cases
-
British Columbia v. Teal Cedar Products Ltd., 2015 BCCA 263
...326 , a majority of this Court allowed two appeals that were heard together. They are appeals by the Province from a judgment, indexed as 2012 BCSC 543, given on an appeal and cross-appeal of an arbitration award to Teal Cedar Products Ltd. for compensation under the Forestry Revitalization......
-
Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. British Columbia, 2017 SCC 32
...465 , 109 L.C.R. 276 , [2013] B.C.J. No. 1480 (QL), 2013 CarswellBC 2059 (WL Can.), setting aside a decision of Bauman C.J., 2012 BCSC 543, [2012] B.C.J. No. 735 (QL), 2012 CarswellBC 1054 (WL Can.), which partially upheld an arbitrator’s decision. Appeal allowed ......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Arbitration Parties Beware: The Supreme Court Of Canada Unpacks The Sattva Test For Appellate Review Of Arbitration Awards In Teal Cedar Products Ltd v British Columbia
...was not entitled to improvements compensation for the unaffected license. Judicial History On appeal, the British Columbia Supreme Court (2012 BCSC 543) upheld the arbitrator's award except in connection with the Statutory Application Issue, which was remitted to the arbitrator and resulted......