B.L.S. v. D.J.S.,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Norell |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 BCSC 1311 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | E44629 |
| Date | 06 July 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Sperring v Shutiak,
...was given liberty to amend his response to family claim and counterclaim to plead s. 95 of the Family Law Act. 4 For reasons indexed at 2021 BCSC 1311 (the “Second Reasons”) the trial judge a) the family property should be divided pursuant to the provisions of the Family Law A......
-
Crossley v. Vorell, 2021 BCSC 2484
...[97] There is more latitude for the admission of the property assessments: B.L.S. v D.J.S, 2021 BCSC 1311 at para. 124; Dosanjh v. Liang, 2015 BCCA 18, paras.60-68. However its utility here is limited. The respondent relies on the bank appraisals wi......
2 cases
-
Sperring v Shutiak,
...was given liberty to amend his response to family claim and counterclaim to plead s. 95 of the Family Law Act. 4 For reasons indexed at 2021 BCSC 1311 (the “Second Reasons”) the trial judge a) the family property should be divided pursuant to the provisions of the Family Law A......
-
Crossley v. Vorell, 2021 BCSC 2484
...[97] There is more latitude for the admission of the property assessments: B.L.S. v D.J.S, 2021 BCSC 1311 at para. 124; Dosanjh v. Liang, 2015 BCCA 18, paras.60-68. However its utility here is limited. The respondent relies on the bank appraisals wi......