B.L. v. Pytyck,
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Lauwers, Hourigan and Brown JJ.A. |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ONCA 67 |
| Citation | 2021 ONCA 67 |
| Docket Number | C68537 |
| Date | 03 February 2021 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
G.B. v. Shariati,
...also adopts the following statement of the standard of review to be applied on questions of mixed fact and law as set out in BL v. Ptyyck, 2021 ONCA 67, at para. …The Board’s application of the statutory test for capacity to the evidence to determine whether a person is capabl......
-
MAK v. Levitt,
...supported by the evidence.” [24] More recently, the Court of Appeal held in B.L. v. Pytyck, 2021 ONCA 67 at para. 22, that the determination of capacity is a question of mixed fact and law and therefore reviewable on the deferential standard of palpable ......
2 cases
-
G.B. v. Shariati,
...also adopts the following statement of the standard of review to be applied on questions of mixed fact and law as set out in BL v. Ptyyck, 2021 ONCA 67, at para. …The Board’s application of the statutory test for capacity to the evidence to determine whether a person is capabl......
-
MAK v. Levitt,
...supported by the evidence.” [24] More recently, the Court of Appeal held in B.L. v. Pytyck, 2021 ONCA 67 at para. 22, that the determination of capacity is a question of mixed fact and law and therefore reviewable on the deferential standard of palpable ......