Bachman v Scheidt Estate, 2016 SKCA 150
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Herau, Whitmore, Wilkinson ,Herauf, Wilkinson |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Subject Matter | WILLS,EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS |
| Citation | 2016 SKCA 150 |
| Date | 16 November 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
25 practice notes
-
Digest: Olson v Skarsgard Estate, 2018 SKCA 64
...Act, 1996, SS 1996, c I-13.1, s 20 Rules Considered: CA Rule 59 QB Rule 16-38 QB Rule 16-46 Cases Considered: Bachman v Scheidt Estate, 2016 SKCA 150, [2017] 2 WWR 301 Benson v Benson (1994), 120 Sask R 17, 3 RFL (4th) 291 Collicutt Estate, Re (1993), 120 NSR (2d) 389 Hope v Gourlay, 2015 S......
-
Digest: Kyrylchuk Estate, Re, 2018 SKQB 132
...the claim. Rules Considered: QB Rule 7-9(2)(e) QB Rule 16-46 QB Rule 16-47 QB Rule 16-47(1) Cases Considered: Bachman v Scheidt Estate, 2016 SKCA 150, [2017] 2 WWR 301 Bear v Merck Frosst Canada & Co., 2011 SKCA 152, 345 DLR (4th) 152, 385 Sask R 76 Canada (Attorney General) v Merchant ......
-
Digest: Kot v Kot, 2018 SKQB 338
...Rules Considered: QB Rule 13-30 QB Rule 13-30(2) QB Rule 16-46 QB Rule 16-47 QB Rule 16-48 Cases Considered: Bachman v Scheidt Estate, 2016 SKCA 150, [2017] 2 WWR 301 Dieno v Dieno Estate, [1996] 10 WWR 375, 147 Sask R 14, 13 ETR (2d) 211 Karpinski v Zookewich Estate, 2018 SKCA 56 Neuberger......
-
Digest: Karpinski v Zookewich Estate, 2018 SKCA 56
...of the chambers judge. Statutes Considered: Wills Act, 1996, SS 1996, c W-14.1, s 7 Cases Considered: Bachman v Scheidt Estate, 2016 SKCA 150, [2017] 2 WWR 301 Craig v Lamoureux, [1920] AC 349, 50 DLR 10 Kapacila Estate v Otto, 2010 SKCA 85, 359 Sask R 84 Karpinski v Lozinski, 2017 SKQB 278......
Request a trial to view additional results
18 cases
-
KYRYLCHUK v. COX, 2018 SKQB 132
...of Canada v Ritchie, 2007 SKCA 64, 293 Sask R 238; Kapacila Estate v Otto, 2010 SKCA 85, 359 Sask R 84; and Bachman v Scheidt Estate, 2016 SKCA 150, [2017] 2 WWR 301. [29] The procedure to challenge a will on the basis of a lack of testamentary capacity contemplates a two stage process. The......
-
RIBEN v. RIBEN,
...there is a genuine issue to be tried. To reiterate, the balance to be struck is captured by the following statement in Bachman v Scheidt, 2016 SKCA 150, [2017] 2 WWR [16] ... Although the Chambers judge may consider evidence from both parties, it is not his or her jo......
-
Kot v Kot,
...a genuine issue to be tried. To reiterate, the balance to be struck is captured by the following statement in Bachman v Scheidt Estate, 2016 SKCA 150, [2017] 2 WWR 301: [16] … Although the Chambers judge may consider evidence from both parties, it is not his or her job to weigh conflicting ......
-
Olson v Skarsgard Estate, 2018 SKCA 64
...in Ritchie v Royal Trust Corporation of Canada, 2007 SKCA 64, 293 Sask R 238, which Herauf J.A. recently confirmed in Bachman v Scheidt, 2016 SKCA 150, [2017] 2 WWR 301, where he [16] In order to have a trial to prove the will in solemn form, the applicant must, at the first hearing, establ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Setting Aside A Will: Incapacity Or Undue Influence
...SKQB 278 (CanLII) at para 34. [ii] Otta v Kapacila Estate, 2010 SKCA 85 (CanLII) at para 33, 359 Sask R 84; Bachman v Scheidt Estate, 2016 SKCA 150 (CanLII) at para 19, [2017] 2 WWR [iii] Karpinski v Zookewich Estate, 2018 SKCA 56 (CanLII) at para 28. [iv] Thorsteinson Estate v Olson, 2016 ......
-
Challenging And Defending A Will That Disinherits A Child
...2019, SS 2019, C I-13.2, s 5 - 6. 2 Otto v Kapacila Estate, 2010 SKCA 85 (CanLII) at para 33, 359 Sask R 84; Bachman v Scheidt Estate, 2016 SKCA 150 (CanLII) at para 19, [2017] 2 WWR 3 Re Grosiak v Grosiak Estate, 2008 SKQB (QL) at para 18. 4 Re Grant Estate, 3 Sask R 135 (CanLII) (SKCA) at......
5 books & journal articles
-
Digest: Olson v Skarsgard Estate, 2018 SKCA 64
...Act, 1996, SS 1996, c I-13.1, s 20 Rules Considered: CA Rule 59 QB Rule 16-38 QB Rule 16-46 Cases Considered: Bachman v Scheidt Estate, 2016 SKCA 150, [2017] 2 WWR 301 Benson v Benson (1994), 120 Sask R 17, 3 RFL (4th) 291 Collicutt Estate, Re (1993), 120 NSR (2d) 389 Hope v Gourlay, 2015 S......
-
Digest: Kyrylchuk Estate, Re, 2018 SKQB 132
...the claim. Rules Considered: QB Rule 7-9(2)(e) QB Rule 16-46 QB Rule 16-47 QB Rule 16-47(1) Cases Considered: Bachman v Scheidt Estate, 2016 SKCA 150, [2017] 2 WWR 301 Bear v Merck Frosst Canada & Co., 2011 SKCA 152, 345 DLR (4th) 152, 385 Sask R 76 Canada (Attorney General) v Merchant ......
-
Digest: Kot v Kot, 2018 SKQB 338
...Rules Considered: QB Rule 13-30 QB Rule 13-30(2) QB Rule 16-46 QB Rule 16-47 QB Rule 16-48 Cases Considered: Bachman v Scheidt Estate, 2016 SKCA 150, [2017] 2 WWR 301 Dieno v Dieno Estate, [1996] 10 WWR 375, 147 Sask R 14, 13 ETR (2d) 211 Karpinski v Zookewich Estate, 2018 SKCA 56 Neuberger......
-
Digest: Karpinski v Zookewich Estate, 2018 SKCA 56
...of the chambers judge. Statutes Considered: Wills Act, 1996, SS 1996, c W-14.1, s 7 Cases Considered: Bachman v Scheidt Estate, 2016 SKCA 150, [2017] 2 WWR 301 Craig v Lamoureux, [1920] AC 349, 50 DLR 10 Kapacila Estate v Otto, 2010 SKCA 85, 359 Sask R 84 Karpinski v Lozinski, 2017 SKQB 278......
Request a trial to view additional results