Balasundaram v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 13
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Annis, J. |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,PRACTICE |
| Citation | [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 13,[2015] F.T.R. Uned. 13 (FC),2015 FC 38 |
| Date | 12 January 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Su c. Canada (Citoyenneté et Immigration),
...Squibb Co. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2005 SCC 26, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 533; Balasundaram v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 38; Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health), 2003 FCA 24, [2003] 3 F.C. 140; Canada (Transport, Infrastructure and Communities) v. Farwaha, 2......
-
Su v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 51
...submits that not every requirement must be set out in a statute ( Balasundaram v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2015 FC 38 at para 27 [ Balasundaram ]). Applicant's Reply [18] In reply, the Applicant submits that the Court's failure to consider s 12 in Campana is unhelpf......
-
Muniz v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 872
...that it actually has done so: Goburdhun, above at para 37; Appiah, above at para 16; Balasundaram v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 38 at paras 35, 38, 41. Officers need not specify which investigation or verification process could have been bypassed because of the misrepresen......
3 cases
-
Su c. Canada (Citoyenneté et Immigration),
...Squibb Co. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2005 SCC 26, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 533; Balasundaram v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 38; Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health), 2003 FCA 24, [2003] 3 F.C. 140; Canada (Transport, Infrastructure and Communities) v. Farwaha, 2......
-
Su v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2016 FC 51
...submits that not every requirement must be set out in a statute ( Balasundaram v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2015 FC 38 at para 27 [ Balasundaram ]). Applicant's Reply [18] In reply, the Applicant submits that the Court's failure to consider s 12 in Campana is unhelpf......
-
Muniz v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 872
...that it actually has done so: Goburdhun, above at para 37; Appiah, above at para 16; Balasundaram v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 38 at paras 35, 38, 41. Officers need not specify which investigation or verification process could have been bypassed because of the misrepresen......