Bank of Montreal v. Li, 2020 FCA 22

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtCourt of Appeal (Canada)
Citation2020 FCA 22
Date24 January 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 practice notes
  • Girouard v. Canada et al, 2020 FCA 129
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 19 Agosto 2020
    ...Agraira v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2013 SCC 36, [2013] 2 S.C.R. 559 at paragraph 45; Bank of Montreal v. Li, 2020 FCA 22 at paragraph 22. [38] There seems to me to be no doubt that constitutional issues and procedural fairness issues are subject to the standard of......
  • Janssen Inc. v. Canada (Health), 2023 FC 870
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 17 Julio 2023
    ...decision is baseless. OSIP is obligated to follow applicable precedents originating from this Court [see Bank of Montreal v Li, 2020 FCA 22 at para 37] and given the factual similarities between the two cases, it was reasonable for OSIP to rely on Solvay as an influential precedent. Moreove......
  • Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Verbanov,
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 28 Mayo 2021
    ...Vavilov, at paragraph 112; Tan v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FCA 186 at paragraph 22, [2019] 2 FCR 648; Bank of Montreal v Li, 2020 FCA 22 at paragraph 37. Nonetheless, administrative decision-makers are entitled to distinguish a precedent for reasons recognized by the doctrine of stare......
  • Alliance for Equality of Blind Canadians v. Canada (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 23 Agosto 2021
    ...decisis, an administrative decision-maker is bound to follow applicable precedents originating from any court: Bank of Montreal v Li, 2020 FCA 22, at para 37; Tan v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FCA 186, [2019] 2 FCR 648, at para 22. Decisions that ignore the constraints in settled law ma......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • Girouard v. Canada et al, 2020 FCA 129
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 19 Agosto 2020
    ...Agraira v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2013 SCC 36, [2013] 2 S.C.R. 559 at paragraph 45; Bank of Montreal v. Li, 2020 FCA 22 at paragraph 22. [38] There seems to me to be no doubt that constitutional issues and procedural fairness issues are subject to the standard of......
  • Janssen Inc. v. Canada (Health), 2023 FC 870
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 17 Julio 2023
    ...decision is baseless. OSIP is obligated to follow applicable precedents originating from this Court [see Bank of Montreal v Li, 2020 FCA 22 at para 37] and given the factual similarities between the two cases, it was reasonable for OSIP to rely on Solvay as an influential precedent. Moreove......
  • Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Verbanov,
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 28 Mayo 2021
    ...Vavilov, at paragraph 112; Tan v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FCA 186 at paragraph 22, [2019] 2 FCR 648; Bank of Montreal v Li, 2020 FCA 22 at paragraph 37. Nonetheless, administrative decision-makers are entitled to distinguish a precedent for reasons recognized by the doctrine of stare......
  • Alliance for Equality of Blind Canadians v. Canada (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 23 Agosto 2021
    ...decisis, an administrative decision-maker is bound to follow applicable precedents originating from any court: Bank of Montreal v Li, 2020 FCA 22, at para 37; Tan v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FCA 186, [2019] 2 FCR 648, at para 22. Decisions that ignore the constraints in settled law ma......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT