Basic v. Barjaktarovic, 2019 BCSC 142
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Hinkson |
| Citation | 2019 BCSC 142 |
| Docket Number | S171955 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Date | 05 February 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Fillo v. Yoshime, 2022 BCSC 1578
...Giles; Mathroo v. Edge-Partington, 2015 BCSC 122 at paras. 95-96; Johal v. Radek, 2016 BCSC 454 at para. 52; Basic v. Barjaktarovic, 2019 BCSC 142 at para. [36] I have considered the "Golden Years" doctrine in making my decision on non‑pe......
-
Lewis v. Worth, 2020 BCSC 57
...(1996), 21 B.C.L.R. (3d) 190 (C.A.). [59] Some authorities such as Johal v. Radek, 2016 BCSC 454 [Johal] and Basic v. Barjaktarovic, 2019 BCSC 142 appear to have elevated the second line of reasoning to the status of doctrine (the “Golden Years” doctrine). Other decisions appear to have bee......
2 cases
-
Fillo v. Yoshime,
...Giles; Mathroo v. Edge-Partington, 2015 BCSC 122 at paras. 95-96; Johal v. Radek, 2016 BCSC 454 at para. 52; Basic v. Barjaktarovic, 2019 BCSC 142 at para. [36] I have considered the "Golden Years" doctrine in making my decision on non‑pe......
-
Lewis v. Worth, 2020 BCSC 57
...(1996), 21 B.C.L.R. (3d) 190 (C.A.). [59] Some authorities such as Johal v. Radek, 2016 BCSC 454 [Johal] and Basic v. Barjaktarovic, 2019 BCSC 142 appear to have elevated the second line of reasoning to the status of doctrine (the “Golden Years” doctrine). Other decisions appear to have bee......