Batten v. Batten, 2021 BCSC 2507
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice Mayer |
| Citation | 2021 BCSC 2507 |
| Docket Number | S216700 |
| Date | 17 December 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
K.F. v. J.F.,
...Allibhoy v. Tabalujan, 2015 BCSC 37; Whitting v. Krasser, 391 F. (3d) 540 (3rd Cir. 2004); Gadea v. Rath, 2022 MBQB 5; Batten v. Batten, 2021 BCSC 2507; Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65; M (Children) (Habitual Residence: 1980 Hague Child Abduction Con......
-
2023 BCSC 257,
...the respondent is required to provide “clear and cogent evidence of unequivocal consent or acquiescence”: Batten v. Batten, 2021 BCSC 2507 at para. 36, citing C.M. v. J.M., 2015 BCSC 2339 at para. 175 The respondent submits that the petitioner consented to Z.D.L.'s remova......
-
De Leon Saldierna v. Shergill,
...the respondent is required to provide “clear and cogent evidence of unequivocal consent or acquiescence”: Batten v. Batten, 2021 BCSC 2507 at para. 36, citing C.M. v. J.M., 2015 BCSC 2339 at para. [175] The respondent submits that the petitioner consented to ......
-
De Leon Saldierna v Shergill,
...the respondent is required to provide “clear and cogent evidence of unequivocal consent or acquiescence”: Batten v. Batten, 2021 BCSC 2507 at para. 36, citing C.M. v. J.M., 2015 BCSC 2339 at para. 175 The respondent submits that the petitioner consented to Z.D.L.'s remova......
3 cases
-
K.F. v. J.F.,
...Allibhoy v. Tabalujan, 2015 BCSC 37; Whitting v. Krasser, 391 F. (3d) 540 (3rd Cir. 2004); Gadea v. Rath, 2022 MBQB 5; Batten v. Batten, 2021 BCSC 2507; Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65; M (Children) (Habitual Residence: 1980 Hague Child Abduction Con......
-
2023 BCSC 257,
...the respondent is required to provide “clear and cogent evidence of unequivocal consent or acquiescence”: Batten v. Batten, 2021 BCSC 2507 at para. 36, citing C.M. v. J.M., 2015 BCSC 2339 at para. 175 The respondent submits that the petitioner consented to Z.D.L.'s remova......
-
De Leon Saldierna v. Shergill,
...the respondent is required to provide “clear and cogent evidence of unequivocal consent or acquiescence”: Batten v. Batten, 2021 BCSC 2507 at para. 36, citing C.M. v. J.M., 2015 BCSC 2339 at para. [175] The respondent submits that the petitioner consented to ......