Bello v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2014] F.T.R. Uned. 324

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeAnnis, J.
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Subject MatterADMINISTRATIVE LAW,IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,CIVIL RIGHTS
Citation[2014] F.T.R. Uned. 324,[2014] F.T.R. Uned. 324 (FC),2014 FC 745
Date25 July 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Samad et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 8
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 8, 2015
    ...Nekoie v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , above, at para 15; Bello v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2014 FC 745, at para 26). [21] What this means is that this Court's task is not to reweigh the evidence that was put before the IAD or to substitute its ......
  • Arefian v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2020 FC 739
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 30, 2020
    ...should not interfere with those decisions regardless of whether it agrees with the results: Bello v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 745 [Bello] at para 42. [9]  The extent of the non-compliance was found to be an “extremely significant” breach of the residen......
2 cases
  • Samad et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 8
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • January 8, 2015
    ...Nekoie v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , above, at para 15; Bello v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2014 FC 745, at para 26). [21] What this means is that this Court's task is not to reweigh the evidence that was put before the IAD or to substitute its ......
  • Arefian v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2020 FC 739
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 30, 2020
    ...should not interfere with those decisions regardless of whether it agrees with the results: Bello v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 745 [Bello] at para 42. [9]  The extent of the non-compliance was found to be an “extremely significant” breach of the residen......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT