Berry v. Cypost Corp. et al.,

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeBurnyeat, J.
Neutral Citation2003 BCSC 1827
Citation2003 BCSC 1827,[2003] B.C.T.C. 1827 (SC),21 BCLR (4th) 186,[2003] BCTC 1827,43 CPC (5th) 275
Date17 October 2003
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)

Berry v. Cypost Corp., [2003] B.C.T.C. 1827 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2003] B.C.T.C. TBEd. DE.071

Steven Berry and Tia Berry (plaintiffs) v. Cypost Corporation, Epost Innovations Inc., Kelly Shane Montalban, Tom Johnson, Carl Whitehead, and Robert Sendoh (defendants)

(S006790; 2003 BCSC 1827)

Indexed As: Berry v. Cypost Corp. et al.

British Columbia Supreme Court

Vancouver

Burnyeat, J.

December 4, 2003.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Evidence - Topic 3626

Documentary evidence - Private documents - Letters or documents written without prejudice - Settlement negotiations - See paragraphs 1 to 27.

Evidence - Topic 3629

Documentary evidence - Private documents - Letters or documents written without prejudice - Admissibility - Portions of letters - See paragraphs 1 to 27.

Cases Noticed:

725952 Ontario Ltd. v. Desuri Homes Inc., [1995] O.J. No. 1208 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 7].

Greenwood v. Fitts (1961), 29 D.L.R.(2d) 260 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 8].

Middelkamp et al. v. Fraser Valley Real Estate Board et al. (1992), 17 B.C.A.C. 134; 29 W.A.C. 134; 96 D.L.R.(4th) 227 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 12].

Derco Industries Ltd. v. Grimwood (A.R.) Ltd. (1985), 57 B.C.L.R. 395 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 12].

Kurtz & Co. v. Spence and Sons (1887), 58 L.T. 438 (Ch. D.), refd to. [para. 19].

Bertram v. Minister of National Revenue, [1996] 1 F.C. 756; 191 N.R. 218; 96 D.T.C. 6034 (F.C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

Franklin v. British Columbia Buildings Corp., [2000] B.C.T.C. 130 (S.C. Master), refd to. [para. 19].

Independent Research Services v. Cantrall, [1993] I.C.R. 1, refd to. [para. 19].

Clark v. Grand Trunk Railway (1869), 29 U.C.Q.B. 136 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

Usher v. Simpson (1909), 13 O.W.R. 285 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

Cote v. Rooney (1982), 137 D.L.R.(3d) 371; 29 C.P.C. 261 (Ont. S.C.), refd to. [para. 19].

Daintrey, Re; Ex parte Holt, [1893] 2 Q.B. 116 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

Schetky v. Cochrane, [1918] 1 W.W.R. 821; 24 B.C.R. 496 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

Fraresso v. Wanczyk et al., [1998] B.C.T.C. Uned. F12 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 19].

Pearlamn v. National Life Assurance Co. of Canada (1917), 39 O.L.R. 131 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 19].

McLeod v. Pearson, [1931] 3 W.W.R. 4; [1931] 4 D.L.R. 673 (Alta. T.D.), refd to. [para. 19].

Fischer v. Rober Bell Engine & Thresher Co., [1923] W.W.R. 320 (Sask. K.B.), revd. on other grounds [1924] 3 D.L.R. 545 (Sask. C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

Vardon v. Vardon (1883), 6 O.R. 719 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

Omnium Securities Co. v. Richardson (1884), 7 O.R. 182 (Ch.), refd to. [para. 19].

Tomlin v. Standard Telephones and Cables Ltd., [1969] 1 W.L.R. 1378 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

River Steamer Co., Re; Mitchell's Claim (1871), 6 L.R. Ch. App. 822, refd to. [para. 19].

Cameron Packaging Ltd. v. Ruddy (1983), 31 C.P.C. 154 (Ont. H.C.), affd. (1984), 41 C.P.C. 154 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

Rush v. Tomkins v. Greater London Council, [1988] 3 W.L.R. 939 (H.L.), reving [1988] 2 W.L.R. 533; [1988] 1 All E.R. 549 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

Forest Protection Ltd. et al. v. Bayer AG et al. (1998), 207 N.B.R.(2d) 50; 529 A.P.R. 50; 169 D.L.R.(4th) 374 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

Darby v. Maier, [1995] 8 W.W.R. 525; 8 B.C.L.R.(3d) 41 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 19].

FS Industries Ltd. v. MacDonald (1991), 105 N.S.R.(2d) 271; 284 A.P.R. 271 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 19].

Walker v. Wilsher (1889), 23 Q.B.D. 335 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

Jones v. Foxall (1852), 21 L.J. Ch. 725, refd to. [para. 19].

Lev v. Lev, [1990] 4 W.W.R. 130; 64 Man.R.(2d) 306; 26 R.F.L.(3d) 86 (Q.B. Fam. Div.), refd to. [para. 19].

Simaan General Contracting Co. v. Pilkington Glass Ltd., [1987] 1 All E.R. 345 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 19].

Family Housing Association (Manchester) Ltd. v. Michael Hyde & Partners, [1993] 2 All E.R. 567 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

Redifusion Simulation v. Link Miles Ltd., [1992] F.S.R. 195, refd to. [para. 19].

Belanger v. Gilbert, [1984] 6 W.W.R. 474; 58 B.C.L.R. 191; 14 D.L.R.(4th) 428 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

Carfra v. Rader (1994), 99 B.C.L.R.(2d) 311 (S.C. Master), refd to. [para. 19].

Low v. Petro-Canada Ltd., [2001] B.C.T.C. 251 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 19].

Sign-O-Lite Signs Ltd. v. Carruthers et al., [2000] B.C.T.C. 1016 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 19].

Unger v. Fortin et al., [1997] B.C.T.C. Uned. 532; 33 B.C.L.R.(3d) 97; 43 C.C.L.I.(2d) 28 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 19].

Bank of Ottawa v. Stamco Ltd. (1915), 8 W.W.R. 574 (Sask. T.D.), refd to. [para. 19].

Mueller Canada Inc. v. State Contracting Inc. (1989), 41 C.P.C.(2d) 291 (Ont. H.C.), refd to. [para. 19].

Kenton Farm Corp. v. J and N Steel Builders Co. et al. (1990), 71 Man.R.(2d) 229 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 19].

Murray v. Hough et al., [2002] B.C.T.C. 339 (S.C. Master), refd to. [para. 19].

Bains v. Bhandar, [1997] B.C.T.C. Uned. A70 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 19].

Enns v. Pullen (1994), 96 B.C.L.R.(2d) 319 (Master), refd to. [para. 19].

AMEC E & C Services Ltd. v. Nova Chemicals (Canada) Ltd., [2002] O.J. No. 4088 (Master), refd to. [para. 19].

Ballard et al. v. Stavro et al. (1997), 38 O.T.C. 321 (Gen. Div.), refd to. [para. 19].

Angel v. Deni, [1995] B.C.J. No. 177, refd to. [para. 19].

Morrissey v. Quinlan et al. (2002), 213 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 341; 640 A.P.R. 341; 20 C.P.C.(5th) 387; 2002 CarswellNfld 118 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 19].

Ship Giovanna, Re, [1999] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 867, refd to. [para. 19].

Trask v. Canada Life Assurance Co., [2002] B.C.T.C. 1741 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 19].

Pederson v. Lehn (1981), 28 B.C.L.R. 309 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

Desert Investments Ltd., Re; Desert Investments Ltd. Estate v. Gateway Hotels Ltd. (1982), 18 Sask.R. 244; 41 C.B.R.(N.S.) 151 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 19].

Touche Ross Ltd. v. Gateway Hotels Ltd. - see Desert Investments Ltd., Re; Desert Investments Ltd. Estate v. Gateway Hotels Ltd.

Somatra v. Sinclair Roche & Temperley, [2000] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 673, refd to. [para. 19].

Donric Enterprises Ltd. v. Northco Foods Ltd., [1994] S.J. No. 482 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 27].

Counsel:

R.S. Anderson, T.M. Tomchak and J.A. Rowan, for Steven Berry and Tia Berry;

J.E. Wittmann and K. Wiebe, for Tom Johnston;

Kelly Shane Montalban, Carl Whitehead and Robert Sendoh appeared on their own behalf.

This case was heard on October 17, 2003, before Burnyeat, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on December 4, 2003.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 practice notes
  • Brown v. Cape Breton (Regional Municipality), 2011 NSCA 32
    • Canada
    • Nova Scotia Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • April 1, 2011
    ...262 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 173; 794 A.P.R. 173; 2007 NLCA 1, refd to. [para. 68]. Berry v. Cypost Corp. et al., [2003] B.C.T.C. 1827; 2003 BCSC 1827, refd to. [para. Milicevic v. Jakubec (2005), 385 A.R. 148; 2005 ABQB 654, refd to. [para. 73]. Pangburn v. Leeder-Kroyer, [2003] O.T.C. 1048; 2......
  • Garner v. Bank of Nova Scotia, (2015) 360 N.S.R.(2d) 200 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Nova Scotia Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • May 15, 2014
    ...constitute a valid exception to the blanket privilege (see reviews of types of exceptions to the rule in Berry v. Cypost Corp. (2003), 43 C.P.C. (5th) 275, 2003 BCSC 1827, and Unilever plc v. The Proctor & Gamble Co. , [2000] 1 W.L.R. 2436 (C.A.)). However, the test for discharging the ......
  • Meyers v. Dunphy, (2007) 262 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 173 (NLCA)
    • Canada
    • Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal (Newfoundland)
    • October 19, 2006
    ...134 ; 29 W.A.C. 134 ; 71 B.C.L.R.(2d) 276 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 23]. Berry v. Cypost Corp. et al., [2003] B.C.T.C. 1827 ; 21 B.C.L.R.(4th) 186 (S.C.), refd to. [para. Dos Santos Estate v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada (2005), 207 B.C.A.C. 54 ; 341 W.A.C. 54 ; 249 D.L.R.(4th) 416......
  • Sandhu et al. v. HSBC Finance Mortgages Inc. et al., 2016 BCCA 301
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • January 12, 2016
    ...many exceptions to the general rule that "without prejudice" letters should not be placed before the Court: Berry v. Cypost Corp. (2003), 21 B.C.L.R.(4th) 186 (S.C.). [30] I conclude that Messrs. Sandhu are appropriate representatives of the Class. As well, the presence of the Simmons Plain......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
20 cases
  • Brown v. Cape Breton (Regional Municipality), 2011 NSCA 32
    • Canada
    • Nova Scotia Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • April 1, 2011
    ...262 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 173; 794 A.P.R. 173; 2007 NLCA 1, refd to. [para. 68]. Berry v. Cypost Corp. et al., [2003] B.C.T.C. 1827; 2003 BCSC 1827, refd to. [para. Milicevic v. Jakubec (2005), 385 A.R. 148; 2005 ABQB 654, refd to. [para. 73]. Pangburn v. Leeder-Kroyer, [2003] O.T.C. 1048; 2......
  • Garner v. Bank of Nova Scotia, (2015) 360 N.S.R.(2d) 200 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Nova Scotia Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • May 15, 2014
    ...constitute a valid exception to the blanket privilege (see reviews of types of exceptions to the rule in Berry v. Cypost Corp. (2003), 43 C.P.C. (5th) 275, 2003 BCSC 1827, and Unilever plc v. The Proctor & Gamble Co. , [2000] 1 W.L.R. 2436 (C.A.)). However, the test for discharging the ......
  • Meyers v. Dunphy, (2007) 262 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 173 (NLCA)
    • Canada
    • Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal (Newfoundland)
    • October 19, 2006
    ...134 ; 29 W.A.C. 134 ; 71 B.C.L.R.(2d) 276 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 23]. Berry v. Cypost Corp. et al., [2003] B.C.T.C. 1827 ; 21 B.C.L.R.(4th) 186 (S.C.), refd to. [para. Dos Santos Estate v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada (2005), 207 B.C.A.C. 54 ; 341 W.A.C. 54 ; 249 D.L.R.(4th) 416......
  • Sandhu et al. v. HSBC Finance Mortgages Inc. et al., 2016 BCCA 301
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • January 12, 2016
    ...many exceptions to the general rule that "without prejudice" letters should not be placed before the Court: Berry v. Cypost Corp. (2003), 21 B.C.L.R.(4th) 186 (S.C.). [30] I conclude that Messrs. Sandhu are appropriate representatives of the Class. As well, the presence of the Simmons Plain......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT