Bewsher v. Canada, 2020 FCA 216
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Court | Court of Appeal (Canada) |
Citation | 2020 FCA 216 |
Date | 15 December 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE v. FREDERICK SHARP AND DOCKET: A-169-20 STYLE OF CAUSE: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE v. ESTATE OF MARY HETHEY AND DOCKET: A-170-20 STYLE OF CAUSE: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE v. RICHARD HETHEY AND DOCKET: A-171-20 STYLE OF CAUSE: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE v. BRUCE GASARCH AND DOCKET: A-172-20 STYLE OF CAUSE: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE v. ZHIYING Y. GASARCH AND DOCKET: A-173-20 STYLE OF CAUSE: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE v. CHARTERHOUSE CAPITAL INC. AND DOCKET: A-174-20 STYLE OF CAUSE: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE v. DANIEL BLAQUIERE AND DOCKET: A-175-20 STYLE OF CAUSE: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE v. TERESA SHARP AND DOCKET: A-176-20 STYLE OF CAUSE: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE v. SHAMSHER G. HIRJI AND DOCKET: A-177-20 STYLE OF CAUSE: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE v. FREDRICK COOMBES, 2022 FCA 138
...has held that such an issue is subject to appellate review on the very high standard of palpable and overriding error (Bewsher v. Canada, 2020 FCA 216, 325 A.C.W.S. (3d) 345 at paras. 6-7). A palpable error is one that is plainly seen (Housen at para. 6). An overriding error is one that a......
-
Democracy Watch v. Canada (Prime Minister), 2023 FCA 41
...29; Hospira Healthcare Corporation v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215, [2017] 1 F.C.R. 331 at para. 28; Bewsher v. Canada, 2020 FCA 216 at para. 7). This means that the Court will only intervene in such matters if it is satisfied that the Federal Court erred on a question of......
-
Wi-LAN Inc. v. Apple Canada Inc., 2022 FC 974
...kind of alleged error is one of mixed fact and law, which attracts the palpable and overriding error standard of review: Bewsher v Canada, 2020 FCA 216, at paras 6-7. [25] Second, considering the merits of the defendants’ position, I conclude that the Associate Judge did not make a r......
3 cases
-
MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE v. FREDERICK SHARP AND DOCKET: A-169-20 STYLE OF CAUSE: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE v. ESTATE OF MARY HETHEY AND DOCKET: A-170-20 STYLE OF CAUSE: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE v. RICHARD HETHEY AND DOCKET: A-171-20 STYLE OF CAUSE: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE v. BRUCE GASARCH AND DOCKET: A-172-20 STYLE OF CAUSE: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE v. ZHIYING Y. GASARCH AND DOCKET: A-173-20 STYLE OF CAUSE: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE v. CHARTERHOUSE CAPITAL INC. AND DOCKET: A-174-20 STYLE OF CAUSE: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE v. DANIEL BLAQUIERE AND DOCKET: A-175-20 STYLE OF CAUSE: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE v. TERESA SHARP AND DOCKET: A-176-20 STYLE OF CAUSE: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE v. SHAMSHER G. HIRJI AND DOCKET: A-177-20 STYLE OF CAUSE: MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE v. FREDRICK COOMBES, 2022 FCA 138
...has held that such an issue is subject to appellate review on the very high standard of palpable and overriding error (Bewsher v. Canada, 2020 FCA 216, 325 A.C.W.S. (3d) 345 at paras. 6-7). A palpable error is one that is plainly seen (Housen at para. 6). An overriding error is one that a......
-
Democracy Watch v. Canada (Prime Minister), 2023 FCA 41
...29; Hospira Healthcare Corporation v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215, [2017] 1 F.C.R. 331 at para. 28; Bewsher v. Canada, 2020 FCA 216 at para. 7). This means that the Court will only intervene in such matters if it is satisfied that the Federal Court erred on a question of......
-
Wi-LAN Inc. v. Apple Canada Inc., 2022 FC 974
...kind of alleged error is one of mixed fact and law, which attracts the palpable and overriding error standard of review: Bewsher v Canada, 2020 FCA 216, at paras 6-7. [25] Second, considering the merits of the defendants’ position, I conclude that the Associate Judge did not make a r......