Birtzu v. McCron, 2019 ONCA 777

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeDoherty, Harvison Young and Thorburn JJ.A.
Citation2019 ONCA 777
Date02 October 2019
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Docket NumberC66048
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 30-October 4)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 23 Octubre 2019
    ...Sched 17, s 11(2), Cannabis Licence Act, 2018, SO 2018, c 12, Sched. 2, s 48(1) and (2), General, O Reg 468/18, s 8 3(3) Birtzu v McCron, 2019 ONCA 777 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Costs, Wills and Estates, Conversion, Capacity, Undue Influence, Suspicious Circumstances, Limitation Periods, S......
  • Przyk v. Hamilton Retirement Group Ltd. (The Court at Rushdale),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 28 Abril 2021
    ...is based on irrelevant factors and overlooks relevant ones: rr. 57.01(4), 57.01(2); Bell Canada, at paras. 20, 41-42; Birtzu v. McCron, 2019 ONCA 777, 438 D.L.R. (4th) 141 at paras. 10-17, [14] The trial judge cited what he termed the “normative or default approach” that costs should follow......
  • Hobson v. Turner,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 3 Octubre 2022
    ...not punish the defendants for their misleading evidence. He referred me to the decision of the Court of Appeal in Birtzu v. McCron, 2019 ONCA 777. In this case a daughter succeeded in defending her father’s will that left his estate to her. Her brothers had attacked the will. The tri......
2 cases
  • Przyk v. Hamilton Retirement Group Ltd. (The Court at Rushdale), 2021 ONCA 267
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 28 Abril 2021
    ...is based on irrelevant factors and overlooks relevant ones: rr. 57.01(4), 57.01(2); Bell Canada, at paras. 20, 41-42; Birtzu v. McCron, 2019 ONCA 777, 438 D.L.R. (4th) 141 at paras. 10-17, [14] The trial judge cited what he termed the “normative or default approach” that costs should follow......
  • Hobson v. Turner, 2022 ONSC 5609
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 3 Octubre 2022
    ...not punish the defendants for their misleading evidence. He referred me to the decision of the Court of Appeal in Birtzu v. McCron, 2019 ONCA 777. In this case a daughter succeeded in defending her father’s will that left his estate to her. Her brothers had attacked the will. The tri......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 30-October 4)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 23 Octubre 2019
    ...Sched 17, s 11(2), Cannabis Licence Act, 2018, SO 2018, c 12, Sched. 2, s 48(1) and (2), General, O Reg 468/18, s 8 3(3) Birtzu v McCron, 2019 ONCA 777 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Costs, Wills and Estates, Conversion, Capacity, Undue Influence, Suspicious Circumstances, Limitation Periods, S......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT