Bito v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1370

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Date03 October 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Simon v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1631
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 28, 2022
    ...and applied this test of operational level in a great number of cases over the years: Bito v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1370 per Brown J; Zapata v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1277 per Favel J at paras 15, 25; Mejia v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),......
  • Pena v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 180
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 7, 2023
    ...the adequacy of state protection must be assessed at the operational level is confirmed in: Bito v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1370 per Brown J; Zapata v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1277 per Favel J at paras 15, 25; Mejia v Canada (Citizenship and Immigra......
  • St. Brice v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1139
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • August 24, 2023
    ...its citizens. [66] The Applicant submits that the Officer should rather have relied on Bito v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1370 [Bito] at paragraph 25, to measure the adequacy of state protection at the “operational [25] However, fundamentally and determinatively in ......
  • Belle v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1276
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 22, 2023
    ...writ large (Lakatos v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 367 at paras 20-21; Bito v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1370; St. Brice v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC [23] The Applicant argues that the RAD did not address the Applicant’s testimon......
4 cases
  • Simon v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1631
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 28, 2022
    ...and applied this test of operational level in a great number of cases over the years: Bito v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1370 per Brown J; Zapata v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1277 per Favel J at paras 15, 25; Mejia v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),......
  • Pena v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 180
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 7, 2023
    ...the adequacy of state protection must be assessed at the operational level is confirmed in: Bito v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1370 per Brown J; Zapata v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1277 per Favel J at paras 15, 25; Mejia v Canada (Citizenship and Immigra......
  • St. Brice v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1139
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • August 24, 2023
    ...its citizens. [66] The Applicant submits that the Officer should rather have relied on Bito v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1370 [Bito] at paragraph 25, to measure the adequacy of state protection at the “operational [25] However, fundamentally and determinatively in ......
  • Belle v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1276
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 22, 2023
    ...writ large (Lakatos v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 367 at paras 20-21; Bito v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1370; St. Brice v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC [23] The Applicant argues that the RAD did not address the Applicant’s testimon......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT