Bank of China v. Fan et al.,

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeSkolrood, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Citation2015 BCSC 590,[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 590 (SC),[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 590
Date16 April 2015

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • Cantlie v. Canadian Heating Products Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 22, 2017
    ...on hearsay evidence and factual assumptions, and the reliability of those hearsay statements and assumptions”: Bank of China v. Fan, 2015 BCSC 590 at para. [128] When the totality of her evidence is considered, it is clear that Dr. Pollack-Nelson relied on a variety of information to come t......
  • McDonald and Dickson v. TD Bank,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 8, 2021
    ...dissenting opinion in DBDC Spadina Ltd. v. Walton, 2018 ONCA 60 , 419 D.L.R. (4th) 409 , at para. 239; Bank of China v. Fan, 2015 BCSC 590, at para. [227]     Second, the same issues with respect to the deepening insolvency theory were canvassed by the Ontario Court ......
  • Jurado Barillas v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 18, 2019
    ...laundering is to make it difficult, if not impossible, to trace funds back to their illegal or fraudulent source (Bank of China v Fan, 2015 BCSC 590 at para 160). The relevant question before the RPD was not whether the Principal Applicant could put forward conclusive evidence that the Comp......
3 cases
  • Cantlie v. Canadian Heating Products Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 22, 2017
    ...on hearsay evidence and factual assumptions, and the reliability of those hearsay statements and assumptions”: Bank of China v. Fan, 2015 BCSC 590 at para. [128] When the totality of her evidence is considered, it is clear that Dr. Pollack-Nelson relied on a variety of information to come t......
  • McDonald and Dickson v. TD Bank,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 8, 2021
    ...dissenting opinion in DBDC Spadina Ltd. v. Walton, 2018 ONCA 60 , 419 D.L.R. (4th) 409 , at para. 239; Bank of China v. Fan, 2015 BCSC 590, at para. [227]     Second, the same issues with respect to the deepening insolvency theory were canvassed by the Ontario Court ......
  • Jurado Barillas v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 18, 2019
    ...laundering is to make it difficult, if not impossible, to trace funds back to their illegal or fraudulent source (Bank of China v Fan, 2015 BCSC 590 at para 160). The relevant question before the RPD was not whether the Principal Applicant could put forward conclusive evidence that the Comp......