Blaxland (Michael) Personal Law Corp. v. Clendenning, (1999) 12 B.C.T.C. 194 (SC Reg.)
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Case Date | April 13, 1999 |
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Citations | (1999), 12 B.C.T.C. 194 (SC Reg.) |
Blaxland Personal Law v. Clendenning (1999), 12 B.C.T.C. 194 (SC Reg.)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [1999] B.C.T.C. TBEd. JN.100
Michael Blaxland Personal Law Corporation (plaintiff) v. Colette Clendenning (defendant)
(J990062)
Indexed As: Blaxland (Michael) Personal Law Corp. v. Clendenning
British Columbia Supreme Court
Vancouver
Wellburn, District Registrar
May 20, 1999.
Summary:
McDonell represented Clendenning in a wrongful dismissal action. Following the trial, the trial judge reserved judgment but awarded Clendenning scale two costs with the right to apply for increased costs. Clendenning retained Blaxland on a contingency basis to apply for increased costs and to represent her on an expected appeal. The trial judge rendered judgment, awarding Clendenning $107,153 damages. The employer appealed and obtained a stay of judgment pending appeal. Blaxland obtained an order that $20,000 be paid to Clendenning because she required financial assistance. Blaxland advised Clendenning that he would not act for her unless she paid him a fee from the $20,000. Clendenning refused. Blaxland delivered her a bill calculated on an hourly rate. Blaxland delivered a notice of intention to withdraw. Blaxland sought fees of $26,969.01, which included disbursements. Clendenning disputed the bill.
The District Registrar of the British Columbia Supreme Court held that the contingency agreement did not cover money paid pursuant to the trial judgment prior to a settlement or judgment on the merits of the appeal. Blaxland was not entitled to be paid a percentage of the $20,000. By refusing to act unless he was paid, Blaxland quit and, therefore, was not entitled to a fee.
Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 1583
Relationship with client - Termination of relationship - Withdrawal by lawyer - General - See paragraphs 31 to 33.
Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 3134
Compensation - Agreements - Contingent fees - Whether fees payable before litigation concluded - See paragraphs 31 to 33.
Cases Noticed:
Doig v. Davidson Muir (1998), 106 B.C.A.C. 80; 172 W.A.C. 80 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 32].
Pierce, Van Loon v. Edwards, [1998] B.C.T.C. Uned. D29 (S.C. Master), refd to. [para. 33].
Diligenti v. McAlpine (1978), 9 B.C.L.R. 153 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 39].
Counsel:
Michael Blaxland, for the plaintiff;
Colette Clendenning appeared on her own behalf.
This matter was heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on April 13, 1999, by District Registrar Wellburn, who delivered the following decision on May 20, 1999.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Blaxland (Michael) Personal Law Corp. v. Clendenning, 2000 BCCA 252
...$26,969.01, which included disbursements. Clendenning disputed the bill. The British Columbia Supreme Court, in a decision reported in 12 B.C.T.C. 194, held that the contingency agreement did not cover money paid pursuant to the trial judgment prior to a settlement or judgment on the merits......
-
Blaxland (Michael) Personal Law Corp. v. Clendenning, 2000 BCCA 252
...$26,969.01, which included disbursements. Clendenning disputed the bill. The British Columbia Supreme Court, in a decision reported in 12 B.C.T.C. 194, held that the contingency agreement did not cover money paid pursuant to the trial judgment prior to a settlement or judgment on the merits......