Blaxland (Michael) Personal Law Corp. v. Clendenning, (1999) 12 B.C.T.C. 194 (SC Reg.)

CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateApril 13, 1999
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations(1999), 12 B.C.T.C. 194 (SC Reg.)

Blaxland Personal Law v. Clendenning (1999), 12 B.C.T.C. 194 (SC Reg.)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [1999] B.C.T.C. TBEd. JN.100

Michael Blaxland Personal Law Corporation (plaintiff) v. Colette Clendenning (defendant)

(J990062)

Indexed As: Blaxland (Michael) Personal Law Corp. v. Clendenning

British Columbia Supreme Court

Vancouver

Wellburn, District Registrar

May 20, 1999.

Summary:

McDonell represented Clendenning in a wrongful dismissal action. Following the trial, the trial judge reserved judgment but awarded Clendenning scale two costs with the right to apply for increased costs. Clen­denning retained Blaxland on a contingency basis to apply for increased costs and to represent her on an expected appeal. The trial judge rendered judgment, awarding Clendenning $107,153 damages. The em­ployer appealed and obtained a stay of judg­ment pending appeal. Blaxland obtained an order that $20,000 be paid to Clen­denning because she required financial assistance. Blaxland advised Clendenning that he would not act for her unless she paid him a fee from the $20,000. Clendenning refused. Blaxland delivered her a bill calcu­lated on an hourly rate. Blaxland delivered a notice of intention to withdraw. Blaxland sought fees of $26,969.01, which included disburse­ments. Clendenning disputed the bill.

The District Registrar of the British Co­lumbia Supreme Court held that the contin­gency agreement did not cover money paid pursuant to the trial judgment prior to a settlement or judgment on the merits of the appeal. Blaxland was not entitled to be paid a percentage of the $20,000. By refusing to act unless he was paid, Blaxland quit and, therefore, was not entitled to a fee.

Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 1583

Relationship with client - Termination of relationship - Withdrawal by lawyer - General - See paragraphs 31 to 33.

Barristers and Solicitors - Topic 3134

Compensation - Agreements - Contingent fees - Whether fees payable before litiga­tion concluded - See paragraphs 31 to 33.

Cases Noticed:

Doig v. Davidson Muir (1998), 106 B.C.A.C. 80; 172 W.A.C. 80 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 32].

Pierce, Van Loon v. Edwards, [1998] B.C.T.C. Uned. D29 (S.C. Master), refd to. [para. 33].

Diligenti v. McAlpine (1978), 9 B.C.L.R. 153 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 39].

Counsel:

Michael Blaxland, for the plaintiff;

Colette Clendenning appeared on her own behalf.

This matter was heard at Vancouver, Brit­ish Columbia, on April 13, 1999, by District Registrar Wellburn, who delivered the fol­lowing decision on May 20, 1999.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • Blaxland (Michael) Personal Law Corp. v. Clendenning, 2000 BCCA 252
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 4 Abril 2000
    ...$26,969.01, which included disbursements. Clendenning disputed the bill. The British Columbia Supreme Court, in a decision reported in 12 B.C.T.C. 194, held that the contingency agreement did not cover money paid pursuant to the trial judgment prior to a settlement or judgment on the merits......
1 cases
  • Blaxland (Michael) Personal Law Corp. v. Clendenning, 2000 BCCA 252
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 4 Abril 2000
    ...$26,969.01, which included disbursements. Clendenning disputed the bill. The British Columbia Supreme Court, in a decision reported in 12 B.C.T.C. 194, held that the contingency agreement did not cover money paid pursuant to the trial judgment prior to a settlement or judgment on the merits......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT