Blaze Energy Ltd. v. Imperial Oil Resources et al., [2014] A.R. Uned. 352
| Judge | Schutz, J. |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | CONTRACTS,REAL PROPERTY,PRACTICE,MINES AND MINERALS |
| Citation | [2014] A.R. Uned. 352,2014 ABQB 326,[2014] A.R. Uned. 352 (QB) |
| Date | 29 April 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Alim Holdings Ltd. v. Howe (Tom) Holdings Ltd. et al., 2016 BCCA 84
... (2008), 391 N.R. 383 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 41]. Blaze Energy Ltd. v. Imperial Oil Resources et al., [2014] A.R. Uned. 352 ; 2014 ABQB 326, consd. [para. Bhasin v. Hrynew et al., [2014] 3 S.C.R. 495 ; 464 N.R. 254 ; 584 A.R. 6 ; 623 W.A.C. 6 ; 2014 SCC 71 , refd to. [para. 63]. D......
-
Blaze Energy Ltd. v. Imperial Oil Resources et al., [2014] A.R. Uned. 353 (QB)
...and written reasons for judgment issued on 30 May 2014. [8] The facts of this case are detailed at length in my Reasons for Judgment, 2014 ABQB 326. [9] The specific questions directed to be answered at trial were set out in the 29 April 2014 Consent Order: A) Does Blaze have the rights of ......
-
Interpreting ROFR Exception Clause 902(D) In The PJVA Model Agreement: Canlin Resources Partnership V Husky Oil Operations Ltd. 2018 ABQB 24
...Society, [1998] 1 All ER 98 (UKHL); and Vallieres v Vozniak, 2014 ABCA 290 at para 26. 4 Blaze Energy Ltd v Imperial Oil Resources, 2014 ABQB 326 5 Blaze at para 37. 6 Canlin at para 22. 7 Canlin at paras 19-20. 8 Canlin at para 33. 9 Canlin at para 40. 10 Canlin at para 38. 11 Canlin at pa......
-
Canlin Resources Partnership v Husky Oil Operations Limited, 2018 ABQB 24
... Husky submits that the decision in Blaze Energy Ltd. v Imperial Oil Resources, 2014 ABQB 326 is such a precedential decision. I disagree.[19] Blaze involved the interpretation of a CO&O agreement that contained an......
3 cases
-
Blaze Energy Ltd. v. Imperial Oil Resources et al., [2014] A.R. Uned. 353 (QB)
...and written reasons for judgment issued on 30 May 2014. [8] The facts of this case are detailed at length in my Reasons for Judgment, 2014 ABQB 326. [9] The specific questions directed to be answered at trial were set out in the 29 April 2014 Consent Order: A) Does Blaze have the rights of ......
-
Alim Holdings Ltd. v. Howe (Tom) Holdings Ltd. et al., 2016 BCCA 84
... (2008), 391 N.R. 383 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 41]. Blaze Energy Ltd. v. Imperial Oil Resources et al., [2014] A.R. Uned. 352 ; 2014 ABQB 326, consd. [para. Bhasin v. Hrynew et al., [2014] 3 S.C.R. 495 ; 464 N.R. 254 ; 584 A.R. 6 ; 623 W.A.C. 6 ; 2014 SCC 71 , refd to. [para. 63]. D......
-
Canlin Resources Partnership v Husky Oil Operations Limited, 2018 ABQB 24
... Husky submits that the decision in Blaze Energy Ltd. v Imperial Oil Resources, 2014 ABQB 326 is such a precedential decision. I disagree.[19] Blaze involved the interpretation of a CO&O agreement that contained an......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Interpreting ROFR Exception Clause 902(D) In The PJVA Model Agreement: Canlin Resources Partnership V Husky Oil Operations Ltd. 2018 ABQB 24
...Society, [1998] 1 All ER 98 (UKHL); and Vallieres v Vozniak, 2014 ABCA 290 at para 26. 4 Blaze Energy Ltd v Imperial Oil Resources, 2014 ABQB 326 5 Blaze at para 37. 6 Canlin at para 22. 7 Canlin at paras 19-20. 8 Canlin at para 33. 9 Canlin at para 40. 10 Canlin at para 38. 11 Canlin at pa......