Blois v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 354
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2018 FC 354 |
| Date | 29 March 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Andruszkiewicz v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 528
...prejudicial facts. The respondent referred to Kohlenberg v Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 906 and Blois v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 354. [79] In Kohlenberg v Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 906 , Justice Fothergill held, at paragraph 23: The level of procedural fairness o......
-
Burlacu v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 339
...complaint. In these respects, the applicant’s situation is similar to the one considered in Blois v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 354, particularly at para 37 of that decision. I also note that there is no suggestion that Ms. Cloutier-McNicoll misstated any of the applicable pri......
-
Kohlenberg v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 1052
...the case to meet and an opportunity to respond (De Santis v Canada (AG), 2020 FC 723 at para 28 [De Santis]; Blois v Canada (AG), 2018 FC 354 at para 36 [Blois]). These requirements were satisfied. [33] The Applicant’s contention that procedural unfairness arose due to the denial of ......
3 cases
-
Andruszkiewicz v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 528
...prejudicial facts. The respondent referred to Kohlenberg v Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 906 and Blois v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 354. [79] In Kohlenberg v Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FC 906 , Justice Fothergill held, at paragraph 23: The level of procedural fairness o......
-
Burlacu v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FC 339
...complaint. In these respects, the applicant’s situation is similar to the one considered in Blois v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 354, particularly at para 37 of that decision. I also note that there is no suggestion that Ms. Cloutier-McNicoll misstated any of the applicable pri......
-
Kohlenberg v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 1052
...the case to meet and an opportunity to respond (De Santis v Canada (AG), 2020 FC 723 at para 28 [De Santis]; Blois v Canada (AG), 2018 FC 354 at para 36 [Blois]). These requirements were satisfied. [33] The Applicant’s contention that procedural unfairness arose due to the denial of ......