Blomme v. Princeton Standard Pellet Corporation,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | MacNaughton |
| Citation | 2023 BCSC 652 |
| Docket Number | S211609 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Date | 24 April 2023 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
1 practice notes
-
Blomme v Princeton Standard Pellet Corporation,
...Karen Blomme Plaintiff and Princeton Standard Pellet Corporation Defendant 2023 BCSC 652 The Honourable Justice MacNaughton Docket: S211609 Registry: Vancouver IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Place and Date of Trial/Hearing: Vancouver, B.C. January 31 and February 1–3, 2023 ......
2 cases
-
Blomme v Princeton Standard Pellet Corporation,
...Karen Blomme Plaintiff and Princeton Standard Pellet Corporation Defendant 2023 BCSC 652 The Honourable Justice MacNaughton Docket: S211609 Registry: Vancouver IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Place and Date of Trial/Hearing: Vancouver, B.C. January 31 and February 1–3, 2023 ......
-
Morrison v 0812652 B.C. Ltd dba Timberland Consultants,
...the application of the ESA and, in particular, of ss. 1(1) and 63(5). 38 For example, in Blomme v. Princeton Standard Pellet Corporation, 2023 BCSC 652, the business of the defendant employer was struggling during the COVID-19 pandemic. The plaintiff, a 20-year employee, considered taking a......