Blume v Blume,
| Judge | Whitling |
| Citation | 2022 ABQB 539 |
| Docket Number | 4803 177288 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 11 August 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Blume v Blume,
...with an appeal though the deadline may have passed. II. Facts 3 As set out in the special chambers judge's reasons reported at 2022 ABQB 539, the parties were married in May 1976 and separated in August 2007. They have 11 children, all of whom are now adults. During their marriage, the......
-
Danis-Sim v Sim,
...for long delay is inappropriate, relying on the reasoning in Boland CA. ( Soriano at paras 28 - 30) 33 Similarly, in Blume v Blume, 2022 ABQB 539 [ Blume], Justice Whitling rejected a long delay application in a division of property dispute. In doing so, he seemed to suggest that dismissal ......
3 cases
-
Blume v Blume,
...with an appeal though the deadline may have passed. II. Facts 3 As set out in the special chambers judge's reasons reported at 2022 ABQB 539, the parties were married in May 1976 and separated in August 2007. They have 11 children, all of whom are now adults. During their marriage, the......
-
Pilon v Lavoie,
...purpose and would, instead, add costs and cause further delay: see Wittenburg v Wittenburg, 2003 ABQB 154 at para 16; Blume v Blume, 2022 ABQB 539 at para 10, aff'd on other grounds 2023 ABCA 41 The Plaintiff's claim for a remedy based on unjust enrichment is subject to a 2-year limitation ......
-
Danis-Sim v Sim,
...for long delay is inappropriate, relying on the reasoning in Boland CA. ( Soriano at paras 28 - 30) 33 Similarly, in Blume v Blume, 2022 ABQB 539 [ Blume], Justice Whitling rejected a long delay application in a division of property dispute. In doing so, he seemed to suggest that dismissal ......