Bank of Nova Scotia v. Simonot et al., (1992) 100 Sask.R. 257 (CA)

JudgeJackson, J.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Case DateMay 13, 1992
JurisdictionSaskatchewan
Citations(1992), 100 Sask.R. 257 (CA)

BNS v. Simonot (1992), 100 Sask.R. 257 (CA);

    18 W.A.C. 257

MLB headnote and full text

Marcel Simonot and B.M. Enterprises Limited (appellant/defendants) v. The Bank of Nova Scotia (respondent/plaintiff)

(No. 1177)

Indexed As: Bank of Nova Scotia v. Simonot et al.

Saskatchewan Court of Appeal

Jackson, J.A.

May 28, 1992.

Summary:

A bank obtained judgment against the defendants for money owed under mortgages of farmland and was granted an order for judicial sale. The defendants appealed. The bank applied to lift the automatic stay or to allow the stay on conditions.

The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal allowed the stay subject to conditions.

Practice - Topic 8956

Appeals - Stay of proceedings pending appeal - Stay of proceedings on terms - A bank obtained a judgment against the defendants for money owed under mort­gages of farmland and was granted an order for judicial sale - The defendants appealed, disputing the amount of security held by the bank - The appeal effected a stay of the judgment - The bank applied to lift the stay - The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal balanced the interests of the bank and the defendants and allowed the stay on terms.

Cases Noticed:

Bank of Nova Scotia v. Omni Construction Ltd. et al. (1981), 14 Sask.R. 81, refd to. [para. 4].

MacKay Construction Ltd. v. Potts Con­struction Co. (1983), 25 Sask.R. 81, refd to. [para. 4].

Ross v. Ross (1984), 37 Sask.R. 290, refd to. [para. 4].

Tekarra Properties Ltd. v. Saskatoon Drug and Stationery Co. Ltd., [1985] 3 W.W.R. 282; 37 Sask.R. 286, refd to. [para. 4].

Rieger et al. v. Burgess et al., [1987] 1 W.W.R. 285; 53 Sask.R. 201, refd to. [para. 4].

Middlemiss Holdings Ltd. v. Brothers' Grocery Ltd. et al. (1987), 56 Sask.R. 273, refd to. [para. 4].

Owen v. Thomas (1988), 67 Sask.R. 84, refd to. [para. 4].

Vagi et al. v. Peters (1989), 74 Sask.R. 46, refd to. [para. 4].

Cook et al. v. Saskatchewan et al., [1990] 4 W.W.R. 190; 83 Sask.R. 63, refd to. [para. 4].

Statutes Noticed:

Rules of Court (Sask.), Court of Appeal Rules, rule 15 [para. 4]; rule 15(1) [para. 5].

Counsel:

Gary G.W. Semenchuck, Q.C., and Marilyn Wappel, for the respondent, Bank of Nova Scotia;

Gordon J. Neill, Q.C., for the appellants.

This application was heard on May 13, 1992, in Chambers, before Jackson, J.A., of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, who delivered the following judgment on May 28, 1992.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 practice notes
  • Stecyk v. Smysniuk et al., (2013) 423 Sask.R. 259 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 23 Septiembre 2013
    ...Ltd. v. Brothers' Grocery Ltd. et al. (1987), 56 Sask.R. 273 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 6]. Bank of Nova Scotia v. Simonot et al. (1992), 100 Sask.R. 257; 18 W.A.C. 257 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Jessie Buydens, for the respondents, appellants; Robert J. Gibbings, Q.C., for the respondents, respo......
  • Farm Credit Canada et al. v. Agristar Produce (Sask.) Ltd. et al., 2005 SKCA 36
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 9 Marzo 2005
    ...the coercive effect of ss. 12 and 30 of the Tax Collection Act was preserved. Cases Noticed: Bank of Nova Scotia v. Simonot et al. (1992), 100 Sask.R. 257; 18 W.A.C. 257 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 10, footnote Ochapowace First Nation v. Araya and Shepherd (1994), 123 Sask.R. 311; 74 W.A.C. 311......
  • Braun et al. v. Peszko et al., (2015) 467 Sask.R. 199 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 26 Agosto 2015
    ...Construction Ltd. v. Potts Construction Co. (1983), 25 Sask.R. 81 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 24]. Bank of Nova Scotia v. Simonot et al. (1992), 100 Sask.R. 257; 18 W.A.C. 257 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 24]. Vagi et al. v. Peters (1989), 74 Sask.R. 46 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 25]. Rieger et al. v. ......
  • Felker v Easthill, 2018 SKCA 23
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 28 Marzo 2018
    ...to do so with difficulty in the event that the stay is lifted but the appeal is ultimately allowed: see Bank of Nova Scotia v Simonot (1992), 100 Sask R 257 (CA) at para 5; Anderson v Braun, 2015 SKCA 112 at paras 24–26, 467 Sask R 199; and Saskatchewan v Racette, 2018 SKCA 17 at paras 20–2......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
  • Stecyk v. Smysniuk et al., (2013) 423 Sask.R. 259 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 23 Septiembre 2013
    ...Ltd. v. Brothers' Grocery Ltd. et al. (1987), 56 Sask.R. 273 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 6]. Bank of Nova Scotia v. Simonot et al. (1992), 100 Sask.R. 257; 18 W.A.C. 257 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Jessie Buydens, for the respondents, appellants; Robert J. Gibbings, Q.C., for the respondents, respo......
  • Farm Credit Canada et al. v. Agristar Produce (Sask.) Ltd. et al., 2005 SKCA 36
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 9 Marzo 2005
    ...the coercive effect of ss. 12 and 30 of the Tax Collection Act was preserved. Cases Noticed: Bank of Nova Scotia v. Simonot et al. (1992), 100 Sask.R. 257; 18 W.A.C. 257 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 10, footnote Ochapowace First Nation v. Araya and Shepherd (1994), 123 Sask.R. 311; 74 W.A.C. 311......
  • Felker v Easthill, 2018 SKCA 23
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 28 Marzo 2018
    ...to do so with difficulty in the event that the stay is lifted but the appeal is ultimately allowed: see Bank of Nova Scotia v Simonot (1992), 100 Sask R 257 (CA) at para 5; Anderson v Braun, 2015 SKCA 112 at paras 24–26, 467 Sask R 199; and Saskatchewan v Racette, 2018 SKCA 17 at paras 20–2......
  • Braun et al. v. Peszko et al., (2015) 467 Sask.R. 199 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 26 Agosto 2015
    ...Construction Ltd. v. Potts Construction Co. (1983), 25 Sask.R. 81 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 24]. Bank of Nova Scotia v. Simonot et al. (1992), 100 Sask.R. 257; 18 W.A.C. 257 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 24]. Vagi et al. v. Peters (1989), 74 Sask.R. 46 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 25]. Rieger et al. v. ......
1 books & journal articles
  • Digest: Easthill v Felker, 2018 SKCA 23
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • 28 Marzo 2018
    ...Rule 15(1) CA Rule 15(4) CA Rule 43 Cases Considered: Anderson v Braun, 2015 SKCA 112, 467 Sask R 199 Bank of Nova Scotia v Simonot (1992), 100 Sask R 257 Fehr v Turta, 2014 SKCA 91, 446 Sask R 1 Felker v Easthill, 2018 SKCA 13, 2018 CarswellSask 81 Gerski v Gerski, 2006 SKCA 66, 285 Sask R......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT