Bodman v. Workers‰Ûª Compensation Appeal Tribunal, 2016 BCSC 2436
| Judge | Abrioux |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | December 30, 2016 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | 2016 BCSC 2436 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Lissimore v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal, 2019 BCSC 444
...the consistency between a Board policy and the Act, is patently unreasonable: Bodman v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board), 2016 BCSC 2436 at para. [103] The essence of Ms. Lissimore’s argument is that the Board’s application of the PDES to her shoulder injury did not at all tak......
-
Paleos v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal, 2019 BCSC 1113
...“stringent” procedural protection within the WCAT process. In Bodman v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal, 2016 BCSC 2436 at paras. 76-77, Justice Abrioux (as he then was) relied on Djakovic and found that the WCAT had been procedurally unfair with respect......
-
Halvarson v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal,
...whether the worker “would retire after reaching 65 years of age” [emphasis added]. In Bodman v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal, 2016 BCSC 2436, Justice Abrioux (as he then was) [64] The use of the words "would retire" in s. 23.1 as opposed to words such as "might", "may", or "intende......
-
Colwill v. Workers’ Compensation Board, 2019 BCCA 453
...v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board), 2016 BCSC 2435 and Bodman v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal, 2016 BCSC 2436. While those cases do not directly address the issue of exhaustion of internal remedies, some comments in them do suggest that, where the WCAT ......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Lissimore v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal, 2019 BCSC 444
...the consistency between a Board policy and the Act, is patently unreasonable: Bodman v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board), 2016 BCSC 2436 at para. [103] The essence of Ms. Lissimore’s argument is that the Board’s application of the PDES to her shoulder injury did not at all tak......
-
Paleos v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal, 2019 BCSC 1113
...“stringent” procedural protection within the WCAT process. In Bodman v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal, 2016 BCSC 2436 at paras. 76-77, Justice Abrioux (as he then was) relied on Djakovic and found that the WCAT had been procedurally unfair with respect......
-
Halvarson v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal,
...whether the worker “would retire after reaching 65 years of age” [emphasis added]. In Bodman v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal, 2016 BCSC 2436, Justice Abrioux (as he then was) [64] The use of the words "would retire" in s. 23.1 as opposed to words such as "might", "may", or "intende......
-
Colwill v. Workers’ Compensation Board, 2019 BCCA 453
...v. British Columbia (Workers’ Compensation Board), 2016 BCSC 2435 and Bodman v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal, 2016 BCSC 2436. While those cases do not directly address the issue of exhaustion of internal remedies, some comments in them do suggest that, where the WCAT ......
Request a trial to view additional results