Boehmke v. Grant et al.,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Harvey, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Citation | 2010 BCSC 682,[2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 682 (SC),[2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 682 |
| Date | 13 May 2010 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
Mann v. International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers et al., [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 181
...The defendant referred to various cases regarding general damages, including Neuschaefer v. Leskiw , 2008 ABQB 18; Boehmke v. Grant , 2010 BCSC 682; Fung v. Lu (1997), 9 C.P.C. (4th) 81(B.C.S.C.); Piske v. Vossberg , [1999] B.C.J. No. 38 (Q.L.) (S.C.); and Viex Events Ltd. v. Abela , [1997]......
-
Pineau v. KMI Publishing and Events Ltd., 2021 BCSC 1952
...defamation are presumed once a cause of action is established, but there is no presumption that they be substantial: Boehmke v. Grant, 2010 BCSC 682, at para. 158. Quantification is governed by all the circumstances of the particular [74] General da......
-
Seymour v. Nole, 2022 BCSC 867
...accusation of the commission of a crime such as sexual assault or sexual exploitation. [315] In Boehmke v. Grant, 2010 BCSC 682, at paras. 156-157, Justice Harvey concluded that the slanderous complaints made by the defendants imputed an unfitness of the plaintiff to......
-
Chase v. Anfinson, 2018 BCSC 856
...cause of action is established. However, there is no corresponding presumption that damages must be substantial (Boehmke v. Grant et al, 2010 BCSC 682, at para. 158; citing Brown v. Cole. Nor is there a minimum floor for damages in defamation (Spence v. Hamlyn, 2010 NLCA 24, at para. [141] ......
Get Started for Free
10 cases
-
Mann v. International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers et al.,
...The defendant referred to various cases regarding general damages, including Neuschaefer v. Leskiw , 2008 ABQB 18; Boehmke v. Grant , 2010 BCSC 682; Fung v. Lu (1997), 9 C.P.C. (4th) 81(B.C.S.C.); Piske v. Vossberg , [1999] B.C.J. No. 38 (Q.L.) (S.C.); and Viex Events Ltd. v. Abela , [1997]......
-
Pineau v. KMI Publishing and Events Ltd.,
...defamation are presumed once a cause of action is established, but there is no presumption that they be substantial: Boehmke v. Grant, 2010 BCSC 682, at para. 158. Quantification is governed by all the circumstances of the particular [74] General da......
-
Seymour v. Nole,
...accusation of the commission of a crime such as sexual assault or sexual exploitation. [315] In Boehmke v. Grant, 2010 BCSC 682, at paras. 156-157, Justice Harvey concluded that the slanderous complaints made by the defendants imputed an unfitness of the plaintiff to......
-
Acumen Law Corporation v. Nguyen,
...cause of action is established. However, there is no corresponding presumption that damages must be substantial (Boehmke v. Grant et al, 2010 BCSC 682, at para. 158; citing Brown v. Cole. Nor is there a minimum floor for damages in defamation (Spence v. Hamlyn, 2010 NLCA 24, at para. [141] ......
Get Started for Free