Boehmke v. Grant et al., 2010 BCSC 682
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Harvey, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Date | 13 May 2010 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Mann v. International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers et al., [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 181
...The defendant referred to various cases regarding general damages, including Neuschaefer v. Leskiw , 2008 ABQB 18; Boehmke v. Grant , 2010 BCSC 682; Fung v. Lu (1997), 9 C.P.C. (4th) 81(B.C.S.C.); Piske v. Vossberg , [1999] B.C.J. No. 38 (Q.L.) (S.C.); and Viex Events Ltd. v. Abela , [1997]......
-
Pineau v. KMI Publishing and Events Ltd.,
...defamation are presumed once a cause of action is established, but there is no presumption that they be substantial: Boehmke v. Grant, 2010 BCSC 682, at para. 158. Quantification is governed by all the circumstances of the particular [74] General da......
-
Seymour v. Nole,
...accusation of the commission of a crime such as sexual assault or sexual exploitation. [315] In Boehmke v. Grant, 2010 BCSC 682, at paras. 156-157, Justice Harvey concluded that the slanderous complaints made by the defendants imputed an unfitness of the plaintiff to......
-
Acumen Law Corporation v. Nguyen, 2018 BCSC 961
...cause of action is established. However, there is no corresponding presumption that damages must be substantial (Boehmke v. Grant et al, 2010 BCSC 682, at para. 158; citing Brown v. Cole. Nor is there a minimum floor for damages in defamation (Spence v. Hamlyn, 2010 NLCA 24, at para. [141] ......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Mann v. International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers et al., [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 181
...The defendant referred to various cases regarding general damages, including Neuschaefer v. Leskiw , 2008 ABQB 18; Boehmke v. Grant , 2010 BCSC 682; Fung v. Lu (1997), 9 C.P.C. (4th) 81(B.C.S.C.); Piske v. Vossberg , [1999] B.C.J. No. 38 (Q.L.) (S.C.); and Viex Events Ltd. v. Abela , [1997]......
-
Pineau v. KMI Publishing and Events Ltd.,
...defamation are presumed once a cause of action is established, but there is no presumption that they be substantial: Boehmke v. Grant, 2010 BCSC 682, at para. 158. Quantification is governed by all the circumstances of the particular [74] General da......
-
Seymour v. Nole,
...accusation of the commission of a crime such as sexual assault or sexual exploitation. [315] In Boehmke v. Grant, 2010 BCSC 682, at paras. 156-157, Justice Harvey concluded that the slanderous complaints made by the defendants imputed an unfitness of the plaintiff to......
-
Acumen Law Corporation v. Nguyen, 2018 BCSC 961
...cause of action is established. However, there is no corresponding presumption that damages must be substantial (Boehmke v. Grant et al, 2010 BCSC 682, at para. 158; citing Brown v. Cole. Nor is there a minimum floor for damages in defamation (Spence v. Hamlyn, 2010 NLCA 24, at para. [141] ......
Request a trial to view additional results