Boehmke v. Grant et al.
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Harvey, J. |
| Citation | 2010 BCSC 682,[2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 682 (SC),[2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 682 |
| Date | 13 May 2010 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
12 practice notes
-
Mann v. International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers et al.
...The defendant referred to various cases regarding general damages, including Neuschaefer v. Leskiw , 2008 ABQB 18; Boehmke v. Grant , 2010 BCSC 682; Fung v. Lu (1997), 9 C.P.C. (4th) 81(B.C.S.C.); Piske v. Vossberg , [1999] B.C.J. No. 38 (Q.L.) (S.C.); and Viex Events Ltd. v. Abela , [1997]......
-
Pineau v. KMI Publishing and Events Ltd.
...defamation are presumed once a cause of action is established, but there is no presumption that they be substantial: Boehmke v. Grant, 2010 BCSC 682, at para. 158. Quantification is governed by all the circumstances of the particular [74]        General da......
-
Seymour v. Nole
...accusation of the commission of a crime such as sexual assault or sexual exploitation. [315]     In Boehmke v. Grant, 2010 BCSC 682, at paras. 156-157, Justice Harvey concluded that the slanderous complaints made by the defendants imputed an unfitness of the plaintiff to......
-
2025 BCSC 2471
...for defamation are presumed once a cause of action is established, there is no presumption that they be substantial: Boehmke v. Grant, 2010 BCSC 682 at para. 158. Quantification is governed by all the circumstances of the particular case: Pineau v. KMI Publishing and Events Ltd., 2021 BCSC ......
Get Started for Free
12 cases
-
Mann v. International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers et al.
...The defendant referred to various cases regarding general damages, including Neuschaefer v. Leskiw , 2008 ABQB 18; Boehmke v. Grant , 2010 BCSC 682; Fung v. Lu (1997), 9 C.P.C. (4th) 81(B.C.S.C.); Piske v. Vossberg , [1999] B.C.J. No. 38 (Q.L.) (S.C.); and Viex Events Ltd. v. Abela , [1997]......
-
Pineau v. KMI Publishing and Events Ltd.
...defamation are presumed once a cause of action is established, but there is no presumption that they be substantial: Boehmke v. Grant, 2010 BCSC 682, at para. 158. Quantification is governed by all the circumstances of the particular [74]        General da......
-
Seymour v. Nole
...accusation of the commission of a crime such as sexual assault or sexual exploitation. [315]     In Boehmke v. Grant, 2010 BCSC 682, at paras. 156-157, Justice Harvey concluded that the slanderous complaints made by the defendants imputed an unfitness of the plaintiff to......
-
2025 BCSC 2471
...for defamation are presumed once a cause of action is established, there is no presumption that they be substantial: Boehmke v. Grant, 2010 BCSC 682 at para. 158. Quantification is governed by all the circumstances of the particular case: Pineau v. KMI Publishing and Events Ltd., 2021 BCSC ......
Get Started for Free