Boland v Carew, 2018 ABQB 317
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice D.A. Sulyma |
| Citation | 2018 ABQB 317 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 4803 152156 |
| Date | 24 April 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Soriano v Bacalla,
...or no limitation period applies to a particular claim: Wittenburg v Wittenburg, 2003 ABQB 154 at para 16 [Wittenberg] and Boland v Carew, 2018 ABQB 317 at paras 15 and 16. In such a situation, dismissal of the first action would serve no useful purpose and instead could add to the costs and......
-
HRMT v SNS, 2018 ABQB 843
...noted that striking a claim for support may have limited effect, in that the party simply can file a new claim: see Boland v Carew, 2018 ABQB 317. [67] Furthermore, as a former spouse, S.N.S meets the definition of spouse in the Act, thus he has the right to bring an application for support......
2 cases
-
Soriano v Bacalla,
...or no limitation period applies to a particular claim: Wittenburg v Wittenburg, 2003 ABQB 154 at para 16 [Wittenberg] and Boland v Carew, 2018 ABQB 317 at paras 15 and 16. In such a situation, dismissal of the first action would serve no useful purpose and instead could add to the costs and......
-
HRMT v SNS, 2018 ABQB 843
...noted that striking a claim for support may have limited effect, in that the party simply can file a new claim: see Boland v Carew, 2018 ABQB 317. [67] Furthermore, as a former spouse, S.N.S meets the definition of spouse in the Act, thus he has the right to bring an application for support......