Boukhanfra v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 4
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2019 FC 4 |
| Date | 03 January 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
22 practice notes
-
Sbayti v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1296
...articulation of reasons so that the decision is transparent and intelligible. [57] In Boukhanfra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 4, Mr. Justice Grammond stated the following at paragraph 9: Under the pressure of mass adjudication, decisions-makers [sic] may be tempted to res......
-
Truong v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 697
...(Jaramillo Zaragoza v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 879 at para 22; Boukhanfra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 4 at para 15; Damian v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1158 at para 20). I see nothing unreasonable with how the Officer articulated h......
-
Sheorattan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1366
...FC 876 at paras 53-56. [35] However, a BIOC analysis need not follow a specific formula: Boukhanfra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 4 at paras 18-21. As long as it is clear that the best interests of the children have been considered in the analysis, a flexible framework can......
-
Song v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 72
...be intelligible and that they describe a reasonable path to the decision that was made” (Boukhanfra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 4 at para 9). In my view, the officer’s determination that Ms. Wang’s misrepresentation related to a material fact fails this test and, as a re......
Request a trial to view additional results
21 cases
-
Sbayti v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1296
...articulation of reasons so that the decision is transparent and intelligible. [57] In Boukhanfra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 4, Mr. Justice Grammond stated the following at paragraph 9: Under the pressure of mass adjudication, decisions-makers [sic] may be tempted to res......
-
Truong v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 697
...(Jaramillo Zaragoza v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 879 at para 22; Boukhanfra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 4 at para 15; Damian v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1158 at para 20). I see nothing unreasonable with how the Officer articulated h......
-
Sheorattan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1366
...FC 876 at paras 53-56. [35] However, a BIOC analysis need not follow a specific formula: Boukhanfra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 4 at paras 18-21. As long as it is clear that the best interests of the children have been considered in the analysis, a flexible framework can......
-
Abou Loh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1084
...judicial review or that courts have used to describe the test that they have to apply” (Boukhanfra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 4 at para 9). Nevertheless, it is important that “the reasons be intelligible and that they describe a reasonable path to the decision that was ......
Request a trial to view additional results