Boukhanfra v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2019 FC 4 |
| Date | 03 January 2019 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
28 practice notes
-
Ullah v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...Officer’s reasoning here is similar to the defective reasoning this Court criticized in Boukhanfra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 4, Persaud v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 1252 , and Rengasamy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2009 FC VII. The Respo......
-
Sbayti v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...articulation of reasons so that the decision is transparent and intelligible. [57] In Boukhanfra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 4, Mr. Justice Grammond stated the following at paragraph 9: Under the pressure of mass adjudication, decisions-makers [sic] may be tempted to res......
-
Malik v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...is not forbidden because officers “are required to be transparent, not to be original” (Boukhanfra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 4 [Boukhanfra] at para 9, citing Cojocaru v British Columbia Women’s Hospital and Health Centre, 2013 SCC 30 at paras 31–33). So long as the con......
-
Truong v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...(Jaramillo Zaragoza v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 879 at para 22; Boukhanfra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 4 at para 15; Damian v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1158 at para 20). I see nothing unreasonable with how the Officer articulated h......
Get Started for Free
28 cases
-
Ullah v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...Officer’s reasoning here is similar to the defective reasoning this Court criticized in Boukhanfra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 4, Persaud v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 1252 , and Rengasamy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2009 FC VII. The Respo......
-
Sbayti v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...articulation of reasons so that the decision is transparent and intelligible. [57] In Boukhanfra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 4, Mr. Justice Grammond stated the following at paragraph 9: Under the pressure of mass adjudication, decisions-makers [sic] may be tempted to res......
-
Malik v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...is not forbidden because officers “are required to be transparent, not to be original” (Boukhanfra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 4 [Boukhanfra] at para 9, citing Cojocaru v British Columbia Women’s Hospital and Health Centre, 2013 SCC 30 at paras 31–33). So long as the con......
-
Truong v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...(Jaramillo Zaragoza v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 879 at para 22; Boukhanfra v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 4 at para 15; Damian v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1158 at para 20). I see nothing unreasonable with how the Officer articulated h......
Get Started for Free