Bradford v. Bradford, 2017 BCSC 661

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice Fisher
Citation2017 BCSC 661
Date25 April 2017
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket NumberE14896
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • TDM v JDM, 2020 ABQB 353
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 3, 2020
    ...issue see: James v. Morris, [1997] AJ 650 (QB) at paras 4 and 21; Louise v. Scheuer, [1995] BCJ No. 2510 (BCSC); Bradford v. Bradford, 2017 BCSC 661 at para 29; Fraser v. Jones, [1995] SJ No 659, at paras 9-11 (Sask QB). The decision in Caterini v. Zaccaria, 2010 ONSC 6473 has a helpful sur......
  • Thomson v. Pitchuck, 2020 NSCA 65
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • October 20, 2020
    ...of circumstances permitting the judge to vary of the amount of child support: Hess v. Hamilton, 2018 ONSC 661; Bradford v. Bradford, 2017 BCSC 661 at paragraphs 156–162; A.V.R. v. M.J.A., 2016 SKQB 272; Vargas v. Berryman, 2010 BCSC 3. Did the judge err by not imputing income to the mother?......
  • SP v BP, 2020 ABQB 331
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 25, 2020
    ...in this case appears to be the mother’s own behavior. [79] I find that this is a case of “realistic estrangement”: Bradford v Bradford, 2017 BCSC 661 at para …Some experts in the field have drawn helpful distinctions between “pathological alienation” at one end of the spectrum and “realisti......
  • Doyle v Canning,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 24, 2022
    ...occurs when a child understandably refuses contact with a parent, for example due to abusive conduct: Bradford v Bradford, 2017 BCSC 661 at para 37.  Canadian courts are more likely to order counselling when parental alienation has been established on the evidence before the Court. ......
4 cases
  • TDM v JDM, 2020 ABQB 353
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 3, 2020
    ...issue see: James v. Morris, [1997] AJ 650 (QB) at paras 4 and 21; Louise v. Scheuer, [1995] BCJ No. 2510 (BCSC); Bradford v. Bradford, 2017 BCSC 661 at para 29; Fraser v. Jones, [1995] SJ No 659, at paras 9-11 (Sask QB). The decision in Caterini v. Zaccaria, 2010 ONSC 6473 has a helpful sur......
  • Thomson v. Pitchuck, 2020 NSCA 65
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • October 20, 2020
    ...of circumstances permitting the judge to vary of the amount of child support: Hess v. Hamilton, 2018 ONSC 661; Bradford v. Bradford, 2017 BCSC 661 at paragraphs 156–162; A.V.R. v. M.J.A., 2016 SKQB 272; Vargas v. Berryman, 2010 BCSC 3. Did the judge err by not imputing income to the mother?......
  • SP v BP, 2020 ABQB 331
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 25, 2020
    ...in this case appears to be the mother’s own behavior. [79] I find that this is a case of “realistic estrangement”: Bradford v Bradford, 2017 BCSC 661 at para …Some experts in the field have drawn helpful distinctions between “pathological alienation” at one end of the spectrum and “realisti......
  • Doyle v Canning,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 24, 2022
    ...occurs when a child understandably refuses contact with a parent, for example due to abusive conduct: Bradford v Bradford, 2017 BCSC 661 at para 37.  Canadian courts are more likely to order counselling when parental alienation has been established on the evidence before the Court. ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT