Brennan v. Gardy Estate, [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1337
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Fenlon, J. |
| Citation | [2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1337,[2011] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1337 (SC),2011 BCSC 1337 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | GIFTS,TRUSTS,RESTITUTION,CONTRACTS |
| Date | 07 October 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Informal Care and Private Law: Goveranance or a Failure Thereof?
..., 2d ed (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005). 69. See e.g. Clarkson v McCrossen , [1995] 6 WWR 28 (BCCA); c.f. , e.g. Brennan v Gardy Estate , 2011 BCSC 1337. For discussion, see Sloan, supra note 8 at 129-34; Rosalyn Wells, “Testamentary Promises and Unjust Enrichment” (2007) 15 RLR 37. 70. Fin......
-
A.J.L. v. J.C.,
...a juristic reason to deny the claimant recovery for the benefits she conferred upon the respondent: see also Brennan v. Gardy Estate, 2011 BCSC 1337 at paras. 31–34. Accordingly, the claimant has not established a claim in unjust [288] Even were it not within t......
-
2023 BCSC 664,
...a juristic reason to deny the claimant recovery for the benefits she conferred upon the respondent: see also Brennan v. Gardy Estate, 2011 BCSC 1337 at paras. 31–34. Accordingly, the claimant has not established a claim in unjust 288 Even were it not within the mutual expectation of ......
-
A.J.L. v J.C.,
...a juristic reason to deny the claimant recovery for the benefits she conferred upon the respondent: see also Brennan v. Gardy Estate, 2011 BCSC 1337 at paras. 31–34. Accordingly, the claimant has not established a claim in unjust 288 Even were it not within the mutual expectation of ......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
A.J.L. v. J.C.,
...a juristic reason to deny the claimant recovery for the benefits she conferred upon the respondent: see also Brennan v. Gardy Estate, 2011 BCSC 1337 at paras. 31–34. Accordingly, the claimant has not established a claim in unjust [288] Even were it not within t......
-
2023 BCSC 664,
...a juristic reason to deny the claimant recovery for the benefits she conferred upon the respondent: see also Brennan v. Gardy Estate, 2011 BCSC 1337 at paras. 31–34. Accordingly, the claimant has not established a claim in unjust 288 Even were it not within the mutual expectation of ......
-
A.J.L. v J.C.,
...a juristic reason to deny the claimant recovery for the benefits she conferred upon the respondent: see also Brennan v. Gardy Estate, 2011 BCSC 1337 at paras. 31–34. Accordingly, the claimant has not established a claim in unjust 288 Even were it not within the mutual expectation of ......
-
Harshenin v. Khadikin, 2016 BCSC 2460
...threshold for the claim to be allowed. See Strudwick v. Strudwick Estate, [1996] B.C.J. No. 776 at paras. 15-16; Brennan v. Gardy Estate, 2011 BCSC 1337 at paras. As a result of my conclusions I do not need to consider the limitation and laches issues which were raised by the parties. IV: C......
1 books & journal articles
-
Informal Care and Private Law: Goveranance or a Failure Thereof?
..., 2d ed (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005). 69. See e.g. Clarkson v McCrossen , [1995] 6 WWR 28 (BCCA); c.f. , e.g. Brennan v Gardy Estate , 2011 BCSC 1337. For discussion, see Sloan, supra note 8 at 129-34; Rosalyn Wells, “Testamentary Promises and Unjust Enrichment” (2007) 15 RLR 37. 70. Fin......