Brideau v. Gauvin, [2000] N.B.R.(2d) (Supp.) No. 41 (TD)
Judge | McIntyre, J. |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada) |
Case Date | February 22, 2000 |
Jurisdiction | New Brunswick |
Citations | [2000] N.B.R.(2d) (Supp.) No. 41 (TD) |
Brideau v. Gauvin, [2000] N.B.R.(2d) (Supp.) No. 41 (TD)
MLB headnote and full text
Sommaire et texte intégral
[English language version only]
[Version en langue anglaise seulement]
Temp. Cite: [2000] N.B.R.(2d) (Supp.) TBEd. MR.053
Renvoi temp.: [2000] N.B.R.(2d) (Supp.) TBEd. MR.053
Nicole Rousselle, as Litigation Guardian and Melissa Brideau (plaintiffs) v. Ronald Gauvin and Jean-Yves Gauvin (defendants)
(B/C/716/97)
Indexed As: Brideau v. Gauvin
Répertorié: Brideau v. Gauvin
New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench
Trial Division
Judicial District of Bathurst
McIntyre, J.
March 23, 2000.
Summary:
Résumé:
The 15 year old defendant took his father's truck without his permission. The 13 year old plaintiff fell out of the truck's cab while the defendant was backing up. He rolled over her head. The plaintiff sued the defendant and his father (the vehicle owner) for damages. Liability was in issue.
The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, dismissed the plaintiff's action.
Torts - Topic 309
Negligence - Motor vehicle - Liability of owner for negligence of driver of owner's vehicle - Meaning of "consent" or "gives or furnishes" - The 15 year old defendant took his father's truck without his permission - The 13 year old plaintiff fell out of the truck's cab while the defendant was backing up - He rolled over her head -The plaintiff sued the defendant and his father (the vehicle owner) for damages - Liability was in issue - The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, dismissed the plaintiff's action - There was no evidence that the defendant was driving negligently - Rather, the evidence indicated that the plaintiff fell out of the cab because she failed to properly close the door when she got in - Further, liability could not be imputed to the father because at no time did the defendant have his father's consent, either express or implied, to drive the truck.
Torts - Topic 313
Negligence - Motor vehicle - Liability of owner for negligence of driver of owner's vehicle - Defences - [See Torts - Topic 309 ].
Torts - Topic 337
Negligence - Motor vehicle - Passengers - General - Negligence of passenger - [See Torts - Topic 309 ].
Délits civils - Cote 309
Négligence - Véhicule à moteur - Responsabilité du propriétaire pour la négligence du conducteur du véhicule du propriétaire -"Consentement" ou "donne ou fournit" - Signification - [Voir Torts - Topic 309 ].
Délits civils - Cote 313
Négligence - Véhicule à moteur - Responsabilité du propriétaire pour la négligence du conducteur du véhicule du propriétaire - Moyens de défense - [Voir Torts - Topic 313 ].
Délits civils - Cote 337
Négligence - Véhicule à moteur - Passagers - Généralités - Négligence du passager - [Voir Torts - Topic 337 ].
Cases Noticed:
Canada (Attorney General) v. Mason (1990), 104 N.B.R.(2d) 130; 261 A.P.R. 130 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 13].
Taylor et al. v. Nicholson et al. (1986), 76 N.B.R.(2d) 379; 192 A.P.R. 379 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 13].
Statutes Noticed:
Motor Vehilcle Act, R.S.N.B. 1972, c. M-17, sect. 267 [para. 12].
Counsel:
Michelle Savoie, for the plaintiffs;
Terrence P. Lenihan, for the defendants.
This action was heard on February 22, 2000, at Bathurst, New Brunswick, before McIntyre, J., of the New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Trial Division, Judicial District of Bathurst, who delivered the following decision on March 23, 2000.
To continue reading
Request your trial