O'Brien v. O'Brien,
Jurisdiction | New Brunswick |
Judge | Larlee, Deschênes and Richard, JJ.A. |
Neutral Citation | 2007 NBCA 22 |
Citation | 2007 NBCA 22,(2007), 312 N.B.R.(2d) 302 (CA),312 NBR (2d) 302,[2007] NBJ No 114 (QL),312 N.B.R.(2d) 302,312 NBR(2d) 302,[2007] N.B.J. No 114 (QL),(2007), 312 NBR(2d) 302 (CA) |
Date | 29 March 2007 |
Court | Court of Appeal (New Brunswick) |
O'Brien v. O'Brien (2007), 312 N.B.R.(2d) 302 (CA);
312 R.N.-B.(2e) 302; 806 A.P.R. 302
MLB headnote and full text
Sommaire et texte intégral
[French language version follows English language version]
[La version française vient à la suite de la version anglaise]
....................
Temp. Cite: [2007] N.B.R.(2d) TBEd. AP.022
Renvoi temp.: [2007] N.B.R.(2d) TBEd. AP.022
Marilyn O'Brien (appellant) v. Leonard O'Brien (respondent)
(108/06/CA; 2007 NBCA 22)
Indexed As: O'Brien v. O'Brien
Répertorié: O'Brien v. O'Brien
New Brunswick Court of Appeal
Larlee, Deschênes and Richard, JJ.A.
March 29, 2007.
Summary:
Résumé:
The wife in a divorce proceeding moved for an order requiring the husband to disclose certain financial information.
The New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench, Family Division, in a judgment unreported in this series, dismissed the motion. The wife appealed.
The New Brunswick Court of Appeal allowed the appeal. The court remitted the matter to the motion judge for a proper determination of documents to be disclosed under rule 72.14 of the Rules of Court (N.B.) and s. 21 of the Federal Child Support Guidelines.
Family Law - Topic 947
Husband and wife - Marital property - Distribution orders - Practice - Financial disclosure (incl. assets and their value) - The wife's petition for divorce contained a claim for child support, spousal support and division of property - Respecting financial disclosure, the New Brunswick Court of Appeal ruled as follows: (1) the respondent husband had a duty to disclose and produce the income information required by his statutory obligations under rule 72.14(1)(a) of the Rules of Court (N.B.) and s. 21 of the Federal Child Support Guidelines; (2) the wife was entitled to seek an order for the enforcement of disclosure under rule 72.14(5) of the Rules and s. 22(1) of the Guidelines; (3) the motion judge's task was to determine whether the documentary evidence sought was relevant and, if so, determine whether it had been produced and, if not, order production - In the present case, the motion judge failed to make the above determinations - The court returned the matter to the motion judge for a proper determination.
Family Law - Topic 2415
Maintenance of wives and children - Practice - Disclosure of assets and their value -[See Family Law - Topic 947 ].
Family Law - Topic 4101
Divorce - Practice - Rules of Court - New Brunswick - [See Family Law - Topic 947 ].
Droit de la famille - Cote 947
Mari et femme - Biens matrimoniaux - Ordonnances de répartition - Procédure - Obligation de divulguer ses biens ainsi que leur valeur - [Voir Family Law - Topic 947 ].
Droit de la famille - Cote 2415
Entretien des épouses et des enfants - Procédure - Divulgation des biens et de leur valeur - [Voir Family Law - Topic 2415 ].
Droit de la famille - Cote 4101
Divorce - Procédure - Règles de procédure - Nouveau-Brunswick - [Voir Family Law - Topic 4101 ].
Cases Noticed:
Sutton v. Kay (2002), 250 N.B.R.(2d) 106; 650 A.P.R. 106; 2002 NBCA 33, consd. [para. 11].
Chernyakhovsky v. Chernyakhovsky, [2005] O.T.C. Uned. 216 (Sup. Ct.), consd. [para. 15].
MacLeod v. MacLeod (1998), 73 O.T.C. 303 (Gen. Div.), consd. [para. 16].
Statutes Noticed:
Divorce Act Regulations (Can.), Federal Child Support Guidelines, SOR/97-175, sect. 21 [para. 14, Appendix A]; sect. 22(1) [para. 18, Appendix A].
Federal Child Support Guidelines - see Divorce Act Regulations (Can.).
Rules of Court (N.B.), rule 72.14(1) [para. 10, Appendix A]; rule 72.14(5) [para. 18, Appendix A].
Counsel:
Marie-Claude Bélanger-Richard, Q.C., for the appellant;
Bernard T. LeBlanc, for the respondent.
This appeal was heard on January 11, 2007, by Larlee, Deschênes and Richard, JJ.A., of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal.
The decision of the Court of Appeal was delivered in both official languages on March 29, 2007, by Larlee, J.A.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Foster-Jacques v. Jacques, (2012) 320 N.S.R.(2d) 166 (CA)
...91]. Toronto Star Newspapers Ltd. et al. v. Canada (2007), 308 F.T.R. 196; 2007 FC 128, refd to. [para. 91]. O'Brien v. O'Brien (2007), 312 N.B.R.(2d) 302; 806 A.P.R. 302; 2007 NBCA 22, refd to. [para. Chernyakhovsky v. Chernyakhovsky, [2005] O.T.C. Uned. 216 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 93]......
-
P.D. v. C.D., (2011) 378 N.B.R.(2d) 85 (FD)
...to. [para. 44]. J.A.M. v. D.L.M. (2008), 326 N.B.R.(2d) 111; 838 A.P.R. 111; 2008 NBCA 2, refd to. [para. 47]. O'Brien v. O'Brien (2007), 312 N.B.R.(2d) 302; 806 A.P.R. 302; 2007 NBCA 22, refd to. [para. Verwey v. Verwey (2007), 220 Man.R.(2d) 52; 407 W.A.C. 52; 2007 MBCA 102, refd to. [par......
-
Armoyan v. Armoyan, 2015 NSSC 241
...to the court's fact finding is not a costly battleground, lever of procrastination or "game of hide and seek": O'Brien v. O'Brien , 2007 NBCA 22, para 15; Chernyakhovsky v. Chernyakhovsky , [2005] O.J. No. 944 (S.C.), para 6. The parties' court filings under Rule 59 are vital to the working......
-
Hubbard v. Gore-Hickman, 2008 SKQB 185
...See Olson v. Olson , 2003 ABCA 56, [2003] 7 W.W.R. 12; MacLennan v. MacLennan , 2003 NSCA 9; 35 R.F.L. (5th) 384; Rebenchuk v. Rebenchuk , 2007 NBCA 22, 279 D.L.R. (4th) 448 (Man. C.A.); and Strueby v. Strueby , 2008 SKQB 146. [20] In this case the father argues that Kurt is no longer a "ch......
-
Foster-Jacques v. Jacques, (2012) 320 N.S.R.(2d) 166 (CA)
...91]. Toronto Star Newspapers Ltd. et al. v. Canada (2007), 308 F.T.R. 196; 2007 FC 128, refd to. [para. 91]. O'Brien v. O'Brien (2007), 312 N.B.R.(2d) 302; 806 A.P.R. 302; 2007 NBCA 22, refd to. [para. Chernyakhovsky v. Chernyakhovsky, [2005] O.T.C. Uned. 216 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 93]......
-
P.D. v. C.D., (2011) 378 N.B.R.(2d) 85 (FD)
...to. [para. 44]. J.A.M. v. D.L.M. (2008), 326 N.B.R.(2d) 111; 838 A.P.R. 111; 2008 NBCA 2, refd to. [para. 47]. O'Brien v. O'Brien (2007), 312 N.B.R.(2d) 302; 806 A.P.R. 302; 2007 NBCA 22, refd to. [para. Verwey v. Verwey (2007), 220 Man.R.(2d) 52; 407 W.A.C. 52; 2007 MBCA 102, refd to. [par......
-
Armoyan v. Armoyan, 2015 NSSC 241
...to the court's fact finding is not a costly battleground, lever of procrastination or "game of hide and seek": O'Brien v. O'Brien , 2007 NBCA 22, para 15; Chernyakhovsky v. Chernyakhovsky , [2005] O.J. No. 944 (S.C.), para 6. The parties' court filings under Rule 59 are vital to the working......
-
Hubbard v. Gore-Hickman, 2008 SKQB 185
...See Olson v. Olson , 2003 ABCA 56, [2003] 7 W.W.R. 12; MacLennan v. MacLennan , 2003 NSCA 9; 35 R.F.L. (5th) 384; Rebenchuk v. Rebenchuk , 2007 NBCA 22, 279 D.L.R. (4th) 448 (Man. C.A.); and Strueby v. Strueby , 2008 SKQB 146. [20] In this case the father argues that Kurt is no longer a "ch......