O'Brien v. Simard, 2006 BCSC 814
| Judge | Preston, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | April 13, 2006 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | 2006 BCSC 814;[2006] B.C.T.C. 814 (SC) |
O'Brien v. Simard, [2006] B.C.T.C. 814 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2006] B.C.T.C. TBEd. JN.013
Thomas Gerald O'Brien (plaintiff) v. Janet Ann Simard (defendant)
(S053008; 2006 BCSC 814)
Indexed As: O'Brien v. Simard
British Columbia Supreme Court
Vancouver
Preston, J.
May 19, 2006.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Conflict of Laws - Topic 646
Jurisdiction - Submission to jurisdiction - Effect of - See paragraphs 1 to 25.
Counsel:
Heather L. Jones, for the plaintiff;
Gerhard A. Pyper, for the defendant.
This application was heard on April 13, 2006, by Preston, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on May 19, 2006.
Please Note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Nordmark v. Frykman, 2019 BCCA 433
...120 [O’Brien (C.A.)], in which a judge of this Court dismissed an application for leave to appeal the decision in O’Brien v. Simard, 2006 BCSC 814, 55 B.C.L.R. (4th) 384 [O’Brien (S.C.)], refusing Ms. Simard’s forum non conveniens application on the basis of [22] The chambers judge went on ......
-
Forum Non Conveniens
...this logic, the position in British Columbia has been that a de fendant who attorns cannot seek a stay of proceedings: O’Brien v Simard, 2006 BCSC 814. This may be changing: see Blazek v Blazek, 2010 BCCA Egbert v Short, [1907] 2 Ch 205; St Pierre v South American Stores Ltd, [1936] 1 KB 38......
-
Ackerman v. Saskatchewan Association of Health Organizations, (2007) 295 Sask.R. 70 (QB)
... (2003), 241 Sask.R. 97 ; 2003 SKCA 60 , refd to. [para. 22]. O'Brien v. Simard, [2006] B.C.T.C. 814 ; 55 B.C.L.R.(4th) 384 ; 2006 BCSC 814, affd. (2006), 230 B.C.A.C. 120 ; 380 W.A.C. 120 ; 2006 BCCA 410 , refd to. [para. Han et al. v. Cho et al., [2007] B.C.T.C. C74; 2006 BCSC 1623......
-
Schwarzinger et al. v. Bramwell et al., 2011 BCSC 283
...jurisdiction simpliciter, and thus they have attorned to the jurisdiction of this court. The plaintiffs rely on O'Brien v. Simard, 2006 BCSC 814, leave to appeal ref'd, 2006 BCCA 410. [25] The Bramwell Defendants rely on Rule 14 and Borgstrom v. Korean Air Lines Co., 2007 BCCA 263. [26] Sec......
-
Nordmark v. Frykman, 2019 BCCA 433
...120 [O’Brien (C.A.)], in which a judge of this Court dismissed an application for leave to appeal the decision in O’Brien v. Simard, 2006 BCSC 814, 55 B.C.L.R. (4th) 384 [O’Brien (S.C.)], refusing Ms. Simard’s forum non conveniens application on the basis of [22] The chambers judge went on ......
-
Ackerman v. Saskatchewan Association of Health Organizations, (2007) 295 Sask.R. 70 (QB)
... (2003), 241 Sask.R. 97 ; 2003 SKCA 60 , refd to. [para. 22]. O'Brien v. Simard, [2006] B.C.T.C. 814 ; 55 B.C.L.R.(4th) 384 ; 2006 BCSC 814, affd. (2006), 230 B.C.A.C. 120 ; 380 W.A.C. 120 ; 2006 BCCA 410 , refd to. [para. Han et al. v. Cho et al., [2007] B.C.T.C. C74; 2006 BCSC 1623......
-
Blazek v. Blazek, 2009 BCSC 1693
...are both Canadian citizens; and some of the events underlying the cause of action took place in British Columbia: O'Brien v. Simard , 2006 BCSC 814, 55 B.C.L.R. (4th) 384 [ O'Brien ], leave to appeal refused, 2006 BCCA 410, 230 B.C.A.C. 120; Kendregan v. Kendregan , 2009 BCSC 23, 67 C.P.C. ......
-
Schwarzinger et al. v. Bramwell et al., 2011 BCSC 283
...jurisdiction simpliciter, and thus they have attorned to the jurisdiction of this court. The plaintiffs rely on O'Brien v. Simard, 2006 BCSC 814, leave to appeal ref'd, 2006 BCCA 410. [25] The Bramwell Defendants rely on Rule 14 and Borgstrom v. Korean Air Lines Co., 2007 BCCA 263. [26] Sec......
-
Forum Non Conveniens
...this logic, the position in British Columbia has been that a de fendant who attorns cannot seek a stay of proceedings: O’Brien v Simard, 2006 BCSC 814. This may be changing: see Blazek v Blazek, 2010 BCCA Egbert v Short, [1907] 2 Ch 205; St Pierre v South American Stores Ltd, [1936] 1 KB 38......